IDDQD PressGitHub shuts youtube-dl down
The Recording Industry Association of America has filed a DMCA claim against youtube-dl, a noteworthy Linux command line tool used to permanently download YouTube videos locally. The DMCA claims that “the clear purpose” of this application is to:
- circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube, and
- reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use
In the complaint, it lists three songs:
- Icona Pop – I Love It (feat. Charli XCX) [Official Video]
- Justin Timberlake – Tunnel Vision (Explicit)
- Taylor Swift – Shake it Off
But the question is, how many people savvy enough to use Linux and acquire youtube-dl in the first place are also pedestrian enough to pirate Justin Timberlake songs that they can listen to for free anyway? Out of all seven billion people on planet Earth, I imagine under a dozen people are really that pleb. In all likelihood, this has basically nothing to do with wanting to suppress piracy of music you can listen to for free, and everything to do with wanting to control the political narrative during America’s election season by social media censorship. After all, Election Day is less than a fortnight away. Considering this tool has been up for years now without issue, Occam’s razor leads directly toward the explanation that piracy of the freely viewable is a pretext, but not the actual reason.
So what can be done about politically-motivated GitHub censorship? Fortunately, GitHub and Git are not the same thing; Git is a version control program and GitHub is merely a Git host. There are many free and cheap Git hosts. Here are a few of them:
Additionally, if you feel like starting your own Git host, there is more than open source Git hosting program available free for download:
- Gitea
- GitLab Server
- Raw Git Server (this is the least recommended method)
It’s very unlikely that we have seen the last of youtube-dl, but this is another iteration of the lesson to be wary of Big Tech. If you have a repository hosted on GitHub that you suspect might be even vaguely controversial, it might be a good idea to move that repository elsewhere or start your own host for it, as Pleroma has.
EVERYONE REMAIN CALM
You can read the entire claim here.
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>youtube-dl does not distribute
>"Dear Sir or Madam"
do the needful
Of fucking course it was the MAFIAA
https://github.com/github/dmca/pull/8124
god damn I hate having to take out the jew trash on my own.
kek
shiggy diggy
should have used gitlab from the beginning
Why would gitlab change anything? They still have to comply to DMCA takedowns.
not owned by microshit
when people say "use gitlab" they mean "host your own gitlab instance"
if you host it outside the US you can tell tell DMCA jews to kiss your ass
Fair enough.
>if you host it outside the US you can tell tell DMCA jews to kiss your ass
No you cant because they will go the layer above, up to the hoster/provider.
And he WILL comply.
>>if you host it
>they will go to the hoster
Let them come. If they finally invade China, yt-dl will be the least of our problems, anon.
>If they finally invade China
What China has to do with it?
If I host it on my own fucking server, why do you think it will physically be on soil the US can send their armies?
there are many providers that don't give a fuck about DMCAs, you just have to know them. can be a bit more expensive than usual but it's worth it
>there are many providers that don't give a fuck about DMCAs
Yeah, like what? Bold statements, impress me?
>why do you think it will physically be on soil the US
Why does it matter which soil it is, retard?
>If I host it on my own fucking server
Host WHERE, retard? What server? Are you gonna get internet out of thin air? No, you go to any of the providers. ALL of the providers respect DMCA because DMCA is international. Even Russia.
And no, whatever that retard was talking about China- you cant just get hosting in China, that is impossible. You need to be in China and be on good score to have a hosting platform there. Dumbfuck
if what you are saying is true, how do pirate sites exist?
ps: you can literally do what the fuck you want on the internet if you pick the right hoster
>if what you are saying is true, how do pirate sites exist?
Have you noticed these sites migrate often?
just for you, anon
https://weboas.is/media/host.pdf
>DMCA is international
Lmfao
You burgers are so fucking stupid.
Yes it is, DMCA is respected in most of the countires on the west, there are special tie ins with local versions of DMCA like in EU, for example.
You know, it takes 5s to open wiki page to read up about it?
Host in my fucking /hsg/ retard. Now you're being less retard and saying they'll come after the ISP, which makes more sense, but after me they won't come. They can't raid my front door where I live, dumbass. US is not world police.
t. larping as a citizen of a non US ally, say ahmed.
Okay, sure.They will come to ISP and he will remove your shit and ban your ass. What;s next? Where you gonna host it? Swap ISP? Sure, how long until you are out of options?
I live in Russia, I read the news about dmca removals all the time.
In fact, I'm gonna humor you, but there is a easier way to get shit you dont want to be removed in Russia - just pay for it. Corruprion here is as high as 101% coverage, it is easier to pay to get anything done than use legal system kek
>They will come to ISP and he will remove your shit and ban your ass.
1) they will not
2) see
Yes they will
prove it
I dont have to prove anything, you have to prove your Iceland ISP wont rspect DMCA and ignore the claim.
Because I know for a fact it is respected across all EU.
okay I'll make it easy for you
here's a hoster that claims to ignore DMCA https://aminserve.com/switzerland-vps
since all isps respect dmca as you say it should be very simple for you to prove
google
EU hosting DMCA from US
>j-just google the proof urself
>saw the results
>realized he was told
>instant ad hominem
that's not even an ad hominem
can you do anything correctly retard
ps: switzerland is not even in the EU
Like I said, ISP was your first non retarded argument, retard. Stop raging on the internet and go do somethng else that makes you happier, burgerlander. You are not world police and the world doesn't care about burger laws and burger problems. We pirate your shit daily.
>point a flaw in the argument
>he goes on autistic ad hominem reee and tries to move golapost
Have you, uhh, considering to try to counter my argument instead?
I mean, you can't because you know it is true, but it would look more honorable.
I'm not countering your argument. I'm conceding it to you. Are you so blind with rage from flamewarring everyday that you fail to understand this? Again, go do something more productive with your time. Or don't, I don't care. You're the one getting stressed and reducing your lifespan.
>I live in Russia, I read the news about dmca removals all the time.
Why lie on the internet, my overweight friend?
Just ask rutracker or any other download site what they thing of DMCA.
rutracker is literally blocked in russia lmao
Rutracker respects DMCA, they remove that content. Read their rules.
They were banned in Russia by the court so they moved into EU.
>ALL of the providers respect DMCA because DMCA is international. Even Russia.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
>if you host it outside the US you can tell tell DMCA jews to kiss your ass
Be careful, the US and associated jews have managed to push similar copyright laws in other countries.
Obviously you host it in a country outside of the 5-eyed Jews
>Recording Industry Association of America
Fuck boomers to hell
gitlab soon
>bro haha why would i pay $2 a month for spotify so i can just click a listen to whatever artist, album or song i can imagine without waiting for download and wasting space on my hard drive when i can just use this illegal inconvenient software?
>downloading transcodes uploaded by retards
Hopefully nobody does this. Don't use spotify and download music from a proper source.
>wasting space
lol 4tb hdds are so cheap now, there is no point to pay and use some bloated proprietary software to listen to music
>illegal
((()))
based quantum tunneler
t. Bard
>HQ sound on Spotify is 320 kbps bitrate
Fuck off.
>inconvenient
You type "youtube-dl <url>" are you retarded or something
>DMCA take down on code
What the fuck is this?
Universal Bypass got sued for skipping ad links from an ad link site, code is still up even though the guy said he was going to give up the fight, so not sure in what way he meant that
So it begins
What now?
Youtube already banned me for downloading too much with youtube-dl.
Nothing of value was lost.
Don't download 3+ channels in one go. Idk why youtube-dl doesn't have a way to specify time between requests.
Too late.
really? what exactly does a youtube ban look like, was it your account or your entire IP?
You get 429 HTTP error responses.
thats not a ban retard
temp ban, retard. you'll have to try REALLY hard to get banned by google
still not a ban
>HTTP 429 Too Many Requests
you literally can't get banned by google
Just use your account's cookies.
>you'll have to try REALLY hard to get banned by google
what do I have to do to get banned by google? I don't want to have to deal with their shit anymore.
I would also like to know how I can get google to permanently ban me from all of their spyware
Can one get banned and out of their spynet by either:
a) being yuropean and using get out of spynet free euro law card; or
b) being chink and being instead on ccp spynet which doesn't share data with murican spynet?
Use YouTube vanced with your real account
for me getting an FBI subpoena on my gmail worked
just export the cookie from a browser
You can get banned from Google. And if you do get banned it's game over. Automated systems ban all the accounts the initially banned one was ever logges in with. You also cannot get the account back unless you get a first page >500 points HN thread awaking some onions slurping fag redesigning a logo for the seventh time that month. Signing up a new one is also a lottery and a game against a company that has the capabilities to know everything about you and siphons such information in their integral automated detection systems. This comes from a second account of somebody I know who had to just give up on Google. Reason for the ban? I don't know, he didn't know either.
is that an account ban or IP ban. I'm talking about IP bans
Multiple account ban and ban for all accounts created after. Didn't use VPNs and probably had same cookies when first made a new one so they probably busted it from that. There's a lot of cases like this. Sure, you just can avoid signing up again and use their malware services without an account, but the statement that getting banned from google is wrong. If you meant to say complete denial of service (so you can't even search or load jewtube) then I don't know about it but I believe you're right and would be pretty fucking hard for that to happen to an user
it's not that hard
here are a few ways
use captcha busters
use a lot of Google dork searches from the same ip
block ads excessively on a Google account
>block ads excessively on a Google account
how true is this?
I use yt vanced and use ublock origin
They just banned me from using youtube-dl. I can watch on youtube.com without issues but no longer download. They detect everything.
Forgot to mention: days after I downloaded all the videos from that specific channel, the owner decided to fuck off and delete the entire channel. So glad I got them all saved and it was worth it in hindsight.
just clear your cache
youtube-dl --rm-cache
you fucking moron
howmany vids do I have to download before they ban me? I want to save around 1000 vids before youtube goes full DRM
>banned
youtube-dl --rm-cache
was this an ip ban?
also, was it permanent?
Is there a public git host in Russia?
Mother Russia always saves her children
jews
>git clone
asks username and password
they did also take down the iptv-org repository a few weeks ago, and it's not coming back, but lots of mirrors still exists. they should have known better not to host the page specific download plugins in the same repository as the core app
do americans really
LATEST RELEASE AVAILABLE HERE
GET IT BEFORE IT'S GONE
https://distfiles.macports.org/youtube-dl/
it won't be gone retard
I'm getting it just in case.
nearly all loonix distros has yt-dl on their repos. nothing is lost.
Retard python -m pip install youtube-dl is 6 gorillion times simpler
I'm feel like it's about to go down soon as well
It's also in 6 gorillion other repos. We have time, for the mean time
oh, it's right there, sorry...
>itoddlers
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/youtube-dl-2020.09.20.tar.gz
>>78349982
Emulators are next right
Emulators made by reverse engineering have been ruled out to be legal.
By the same logic you could say that recording your screen has been ruled to be legal
All it takes is nintendo to be in a bad day for retroarch, dolphin and yuzu all go down at the same time
No it's because emulation has already been tries in court
No? Emulating is reverse engineering which is explicitly protected by law (in the US and probably most countries in the world). No bad day Nintendo can have would change that.
Recording the screen is legal. Redistributing copyrighted material that may happen to appear on the screen is not.
The issue with youtube-dl wasn't that can download youtube videos, but that it implemented a method to decode a particular algorithm youtube uses.
> decode a particular algorithm youtube uses.
>it implemented a method to decode a particular algorithm youtube uses
to obscure the url of the actual video. Nothing to do with copyrighted material.
That is not it. Read the DMCA notice. It used youtube examples in the atomated tests.
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>The clear purpose of this source code is to (i) circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube, and (ii) reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use.
>We also note that the source code prominently includes as sample uses
The examples are a secondary reason if they're at all.
That is their understanding, you have to provide evidence in DMCA's claims. The links are the "evidence".
Come on anon read the link. A few paragraphs below clearly states the repo's violation is anticircumvention. And the court decisions mentioned are about technical measures. Below they even cite the source code itself.
That is not the source code, that is the README. It is a documentation file and you can look it up on the repos that are still up, it doesn't mention a "rolling cipher" anywhere. That is the last place such a thing would be mentioned, since it is a end user doc.
What they did is common of the subhuman breed that are lawyers, you mention something that is somewhat accurate (the links) then add a bunch of vague BS to confuse people and waste their time.
>trivial string manipulations is a cipher
I would like to see what that looks like, most likely is just some convenient format or something.
even rot13 can be considered a "technological measure preventing access to content" and if the law bans circumvention that good luck in court
you've missed the point
all videos are downloadable, but not all are trivially downloadable
In any case the circumvention part doesn't apply either. Specifically YT rearranges the characters in the URL of the real resource and they provide you with the code to recovery the original. What ytdl does in download the rearranged URL, the JS code and then runs this code (itself) to recover the original URL. If ytdl is considered illegal then every JS interpreter is illegal as well as it can run YT's code.
https://www.youtube.com/s/player/4a1799bd/player_ias.vflset/en_US/base.js
Xu=function(a){a=a.split("");Wu.by(a,2);Wu.G8(a,30);Wu.z2(a,36);return a.join("")};var Wu={z2:function(a){a.reverse()},G8:function(a,b){var c=a[0];a[0]=a[b%a.length];a[b%a.length]=c},
by:function(a,b){a.splice(0,b)}};
Yeah, hard to claim that is a cipher.
See this. It is not a cipher and yt themselves provide the instructions on how to decode the format (it isn't obfuscated).
a dictionary definition disagrees with you and a court will too
and no including instructions does not make it not a cipher
any browser can crack the "cipher" and youtube-dl is just a browser without a graphical user interface. checkmate
>dictionary definition disagrees with you
> a method of transforming a text in order to conceal its meaning
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cipher
How are you concealing it's meaning if you tell people how to revert it?
>and a court will too
[citation needed]
It'1s conceilling from one party, i.e. whoever wants to use it against the TOS, but it should be recoverable by the legitimate party communicating with the server (i.e. the js engine from a major browser runnning their website and following all their cuntermeasures).
so what if I open a real browser with selenium and save the video files it plays?
i could do that manually too, maybe the network monitor is illegal...
I have no idea, I was just saying your dictionary definition doesn't imply the concealed text should be unrecoverable. A write-only cypher is useless.
use headless chrome from command line is much more efficient
And rereading the DMCA, it appears recording the screen isn't legal either if the media is copyrighted.
You're allowed to make copies of anything you own (copyrighted or not) for your own personal use. This is settled law.
https://copyright.unimelb.edu.au/information/what-is-copyright/personal-use
Oh, good. That's what I was remembering too. That means their second claim is null.
>it appears recording the screen isn't legal either if the media is copyrighted.
Fucking hell, it's so hilariously dumb how pathetic that is.
first youtube's new layout completely btfo's non-bloat web browsers from using the site and now this shit
WHAT THE F-
WHAT DO WE DO NOW BROS????? WHAT HAPPENS NEXT????? THIS IS AN ATTACK AGAINST PRIVACY AND FREEDOM!!!!
WHERE IS THE LASTEST SOURCE CODE???
dude if you have it installed its on your machine. it's written in python. chill out
THE ONE I GOT IS 2020.09.14 NOT 2020.09.20(LATEST)
see:
Same I pulled on Sep 19th. The only reason I pull the repo is because they still haven't merged my pull request after 6 months. Jesus christ all I did was make youtube-dl embed thumbnails for mkv.
FUCK WHERE I'LL GET WINTODDLER VERSION NOW
HOLY FUCK
I was just checking the docs, refreshed the page and it's fucking GONE
they took down yt-dl because of examples???
Who has the most recent commit?
The funny thing is that they are asking to ban it because it CAN be used to obtain copyrighted audio. Going by that logic I would have to disable all my video and audio playback devices because I may or may not be using some recording device. Absolute cancer. Also fuck jews as always.
shithub is not doing anything about it except giving in like the turbocucks they are
"I can run people over with this car"
"I can stab someone with this fork"
"I can make poison with common kitchen ingredients
Hmph. It happens, arrest those that do.
"I can pirate music with this script"
HOLY SHIT BAN THIS SICK FILTH HOW DARE YOU THIS SHOULD BE ILLEGAL YOU FUCKING CYBERTERRORIST
God I wish the RIAA would fucking die already. Absolute leeches.
>disable all my video and audio playback devices
dont give them ideas
soon enough youtube will have DRM
>NOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST SAVE MEDIA SERVED TO YOU
so does this have any legal weight whatsoever or is it the just RIAA getting pissy
It doesn't, it's an invalid DMCA.
But it doesn't matter because US laws are fucked. If you have enough money you can DMCA anything you want.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT???? WHERE DO WE GO NOW?????
>A, the source code expressly suggests its use to copy and/or distribute the following copyrighted works owned by our member companies:
> Icona Pop – I Love It (feat. Charli XCX) [Official Video], owned by Warner Music Group
> Justin Timberlake – Tunnel Vision (Explicit), owned by Sony Music Group
> Taylor Swift – Shake it Off, owned/exclusively licensed by Universal Music Group
Ok, fa/g/s you better gotta search a URL that links to these gay songs in your repo quick. I could bet It's because of one of the script use it as an url sample in their code.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxxajLWwzqY
>'note': 'Test generic use_cipher_signature video (#897)',
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07FYdnEawAQ
>'note': 'Test VEVO video with age protection (#956)',
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM
># JS player signature function name containing $
I like "I Love It"
I am becoming more and more radicalized by the minute.
retards put copyrighted material as examples.
THEY TOOK IT DOWN FOR THE FUCKING EXAMPLES HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
remove the offending examples ans upload again in Gitlab.
https://yt-dl.org/downloads/latest/youtube-dl
still works
redirects to the dmca page
no it does not
Your browser cached the page
https://pypi.org/project/youtube_dl/#files
Retard here, what happens if I already have it installed can I still update it?
if you have a copy in your system, you will keep that copy
Can I still update? It usually stops working after a while.
depends on what you use to update and if directly depends on the github repo
Guess I'm fucked then because I got my copy from github.
hold on to it
still, maybe if they remove then this can be lifted
mine is from the fedora repos, and I'm sure I'll be covered as in I can download a copy and use that until it goes back up or it stops working
Fuck RIAA
Fuck niggers
Fuck jews
BASED HAASN HAS A SUPER FRESH COPY
t word
>https://haasn.xyz/ytdl.git/
thanks anon. just pulled
>403 Forbidden
Fucking DiaRIAA, let me archive in peace.
Just clone it retard
>https://github.com/blackjack4494/youtube-dlc
you have to use git clone you mon/g/oloid
malware
don't worry everyone, it's not over
a mirror repo will be up soon enough on a non-cucked website, the project will fork or whatever is necessary to keep it going
we never go down without a fight
we don't forgive and we never apologize anominous expectimus etc. etc.
In hindsight, having the README examples point to RIAA shit was a bad idea. There are plenty of CC-licensed shit on the site that could have been used instead.
Yeah they should have just used Big Buck Bunny like everyone else.
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl/releases/download/2020.09.20/*
youtube-dl was almost dead some months ago, maybe it needed this push.
The best thing about git is its decentralization. You can just easily move your repos off GitHub to another server.
NO
can YouTube-dl be hosted on VLC git?
*RIAA shuts down vlc*
nothing personnel, kid
wtf, I love RIAA now
VLC develops x264; I cannot imagine giving any fucks about youtube-dl.
there's a *bit* of a difference between an encoder and a program that can download copyrighted media
all media and content is automatically copyrighted. this is nonsense
*RIAA bans monitors because they can be used to view pirated content*
Has the RIAA paid a single penny to a single artist? Ever?
So what does this mean? I have it installed on my computer and ised it this morning. Does that mean I can still use it but can never install it again on future devices?
No updates until they work around this
>but can never install it again on future devices?
You can install it on as many devices you want as long as you have your files
It needs to be updated and maintained though, youtube constantly changes shit around to where youtube-dl stops working and has to be updated. They have to host it somewhere or it will be useless in like a month
It's already been more than a month since the last stable release and it still works fine, panicbot
mfw they were just waiting for this to launch the breaking update
They lost all issues and metadata. When will people realize you need some kind of federated mirrored or something. Hosting your own instance doesn't solve that, or the issue of contributor friction from having to create multiple accounts and workflows.
>tfw they'll never merge my feature request
they can get them back as soon as they do a counter notice to github
but you're right that they should have backups
Backups are useless because it's deeply tied to GH. I was trying to say there isn't a real solution for that afaik. It should work on all platforms and git hosts. Would just require some form of authorization on each of course but other than that it's a matter of having a solid protocol for metadata and workflows like merge/requests/milestones/tags.
the repo is just set to private
>federated
tranny detected
ok troon
>make a Github account
>reupload the repo
Problem solved.
>reuploading to github
negative IQ
>just re-upload to Github forehead
>unreadable text meme
HQ
how long till they dmca browsers since by using browsers you can download music for free
Google will just monopolize that themselves and then kill everything left that isn't chrome based. We're like what 89% of the way there now
Is this the end bros? I’ve been using ytdl for years and it’s already been a tough day. Fuck this news
I'm about to cry
Everything is gonna go back to normal next week. I remember everybody freaked out when nyaa gone down.
But we never fully recovered from nyaa going down. A lot of old stuff is probably gone forever because of that.
gone how? oldnyaa was pretty much completely archived
and torrents continue to work with DHT
Now everyone is smart enough to use DHT but that wasn't always the case. The original nyaa had some ancient as fuck torrents.
Still, nobody cared.
>nobody cared
sir do the needful and share please sir
they were from one of the /a/ threads when nyaa first shutdown, anyway
https://files.catbox.moe/41sxti.7z
Let Mother Mary bless you with many children, kind stranger.
you only have the torrent db?
everything survived in the private trackers
Good. The current maintainers have been really lazy and not merging any PRs.
this
It will be reinstated after counter claim. Similar DMCA bs happened before, even popcorntime repo is still active.
>RIAA
OY VEY!
>writes a software to download videos from youtube
>gets dmca'd
land of the free
Sorry but greentext is copyrighted. We're going to have to shoa you now
Can’t have you archiving unapproved videos
The cloud sure is great.
how exactly was this source code distributing anything?
Dumb enough to put copyrighted material on the README so you can technically download it from the text.
>This source code allows you to download audio from YouTube without authorization
>Coincidentally it also bypasses security measures for age ratings or music and uses VEVO videos as examples in the source code
>We believe that this software is being distributed to pirate music off of YouTube and other platforms
Piracy has always been an anal topic and basically any tool being used primarily for piracy will get its ass beaten, even if that's not why I or others actually used YouTube DL.
The music industry rather notoriously acts above the law, if they're coming after you it's pretty much over. Remember that shit like SOPA and Article 13 was pushed primarily by them, they have so much power they can lobby governments to pass entire censorship laws in the name of curbing piracy, and suppress studies that point out that piracy is a non-issue today.
It wasn't, it's a false DMCA.
>copyrighted material on the README
A youtube link is not copyrighted material.
anyone has full git tree available?
This is the most recent copy (October 22nd) I'm aware of.
KIKED LMFAO
GOD I HATE JEWS SO FUCKING MUCH
Any backups of all the forks?
>f-fucking american jews
>DMCA notice literally mentions how yuros are equally cucked
lmao
cope
The German one is basically as bad as RIAA.
Ok, fuck the jews currently residing in Europe as well.
This shit would not fly in based EU. EU hates Google and they would rule against them for this faggotry. Like said, their shit wouldn't even hold in court.
This DMCA wasn't from Google though.
literally already upheld in europe, eat shit nigga
The notice literally quotes a court case in Germany, although it is only from a regional court.
>regional court
Well if it's just one case then it doesn't mean shit, you need a ton of caselaw behind you usually to get something more overturned at the top.
the Juice is getting problematic in Germany...
Germany sucks too.
And it mentions that the German law is based on the American law, most likely as a result of a trade agreement or some shit.
never ever trust globohomo and corporations
always backup and mirror your shit
fuck google
fuck github
fuck microsoft
fuck RIAA
simple as
>simple as
go back
New Pipe is next
Also its still on pypi for now. They aren't going to get every packaged version.
Can't they just remove the offending material and re upload it somewhere? If the issue is just having links to videos in the readme it should be an easy fix, right?
>constantly ask ”does this support piracy hurr durr”, no we will not add this
>get taken down anyway
btfo
https://github.com/blackjack4494/youtube-dlc
This fork was pretty active, apparently. Has anyone saved it?
>DMCAing a tool that can be used to pirate
Windows, Mac, and Linux are finished
Firefox and Chrome are finished
CPUs are finished
Internet is finished
I don't support this DMCA claim but this is retarded. Their claim wasn't that it should be taken down because it can be used for piracy, it's that it should be taken down because it was designed to be used for piracy and has anti-piracy circumvention in the code.
Ok schlomo
They cite the youtube license in the message. Does that hold water anywhere outside the states?
Then again it works on dozens of webites and I doubt all of them have restrictive licenses.
>Does that hold water anywhere outside the states?
Doesn't matter, GitHub is a US-based company.
>and has anti-piracy circumvention in the code.
windows also has anti-piracy circumvention in the form of allowing you to run circumvention exes
someone DMCA microsoft
>windows also has anti-piracy circumvention in the form of allowing you to run circumvention exes
If those exes were included in Windows, then yes, it would probably be targeted by RIAA. But they're not... so I don't see your point. None of that circumvention code is actually a part of Windows.
yes it is, allowing you to run arbitrary code IS circumvention
windows needs to be locked down and only run applications approved by law
That's not the argument RIAA is making at all. I don't know why you're just acting like a retard now.
u smell kinda jewish bro
this is a non issue, this has been the status quo, the source will continue to be distributed.
And, more specifically, that the repos full on suggest downloading copyrighted music.
It would be like if emulators told you specifically to go to piracy site here to download some roms, once that happens, Nintendo is on their ass immediately. Without that, Nintendo can't do fucking shit.
Literally does not matter, none of that is illegal, in the same way that explaining to someone how to use a gun doesn't make you a murderer. "Nintendo is on their ass" with false legal threats, none of that shit would actually hold up in court because it's not illegal.
Are we pretending to be a lawyer today neet?
Are YOU a lawyer? If so, could you list the laws that say that telling someone else how to commit a crime is illegal?
You "download copyrighted music" every time you open youtube and play a video.
You cannot give people content and then at the same time steal it from their minds after. These lawyers and the parasites feeding them are fucking insane.
>You can't tell me I stole something because I kept it forever if you let me borrow it for a day
>you give someone something
>they make a 1:1 copy on their own
>return the original untouched
>you get mad
smells very kosher, anon.
People like you deserve a bullet. I don't even care if you're just being ironic, playing devil's advocate, joking or whatever.
Found the muslim
Nothing of value will be lost
reminder to cut off your ears and slice out your tongue since even singing copyrighted material is subject to fines. It wasn't so long ago that singing happy birthday made you a criminal.
Copyright law and intellectual property are the worst cancers on this earth
I thought making cracks and stuff was fine under US law? Reverse engineering is legal and good if no copyrighted material is distributed. It's just emulating the requests to the server, so to speak.
In a non-quack court, there's no way this claim stands. It's retarded.
It is fine, as I have said already several times this is an invalid DMCA that would not hold up in court. No copyrighted content in the repo = no valid DMCA.
>Retard posts a link to a mirror
>It gets shoah'd immediately
They're monitoring this thread you fucking speds. Quit fucking posting shit if you don't want it taken down.
Hollywood kikes always operate under "rules for thee but not for me."
>>Retard posts a link to a mirror
>>It gets shoah'd immediately
impressive job pulling that out of your ass
retarded anime addicted NEET with unwarranted self importance
nobody cares about this worthless shithole website nobody important is here or monitoring it
t. RIAA lawyers
see
That repo was already disabled automatically genius.
that's not a mirror and was included in the original DMCA notice
see
=>
why does he glow in the dark
>why does he glow in the dark
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=glownigger
ok scumbag
>link to a mirror
If you're talking about this - it has been disabled by the same DMCA automatically, along with every other fork. That's how GitHub works.
By the way, who has to submit a counter-DMCA now - just the yt-dl git owner, or every individual fork too?
thanks for posting hajime ichinose, I still have post series depression about gatchaman crowds
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=SnLB8wysMbY
Fuck youtube-dlc also went down with it.
Newpipe is kill?
How will this affect distro repos downstream? No updates but they can still host them right?
imagine literally thinking github devs are on this shithole
>he doesn't know
based retard
So, what now? Are we fucked in the ass again and there nothing we can do about it?
You record spotify with audacity and go afk
are you retarded? all yo have to do is host it on a non-jewish git service, or even a self-hosted one and the problem is solved.
reuload to a git server located in a free country, problem solved
the devs will just migrate to gitlab or something, it doesn't matter. but it doesn't matter only because not every country in the world is as cucked as the US, you might want to look into fixing your shithole
cucked country.
these cocksuckers are about to discover the streisand effect
Who the fuck downloads shitty lossy music from youtube anyway?
Can't hear any difference
based deaf retard
t. blind retard who can't see above 720p
Imagine contributing to open source software L M A O
RIP, the joos did it again
IMAGINE ATTACHING YOUR REAL NAME TO YOUR GITHUB
AHAHAHAHA
doesn't matter if your real name is attached, (((they))) can find you either way unless you're also using an offshore vpn
imagine thinking
Why does YouTube get a pass?
The music is specifically licensed to be used on Youtube
God dammit not my fucking Newpipe!!!!!!
https://haasn.xyz/ytdl.git/ now on i2p
>magnet:?xt=urn:btih:f92be36d58ae7080ca6cbf9a1d803a964f5cf2a6&dn=youtube-dl+latest+known+git+repository&tr=http://tracker2.postman.i2p/announce.php
>http://tracker2.postman.i2p/index.php?view=TorrentDetail&id=56893
based
i2p git servers when?
Gonna help seeding on my 10gbe seedbox.
But first fuck microshit and fuck kikes
You are meant to serve the jos goy.
They didn't, he was nominated by the Chancellor.
This is the law mentioned in the DMCA notice. I can't understand it because I am retarded and not a lawyer but this seems contradictory to reverse engineering law. Not to mention it isn't unauthorized access because the content is public to begin with. youtube-dl could only rip stuff that was public or at least unlisted.
https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap12.html#1205
the dmca claim mentions parity with german law as well.
DMCA aren't about legality. It's a threat that tells you it could go to court if you refuse to comply. I highly doubt downloading video from youtube present any legal issue but no one can afford to pay months worth of lawyers except the people making the threats.
Also should be noted a lot of sites don't even follow the DMCA policy directly and have their own takedown implementation but still use the moniker "DMCA".
If they fight this in court there is no way they can lose.
This is illegal in America.
Well at least they can now fully ignore those thousands of issue reports lol
>>78349832
based, remember to livestream the playthrough
RIAA doesn't own any of the code, they shouldn't have the right to request a DMCA takedown. Same thing happened before with stuff like popcorntime, all they have to do is file a counter-claim.
Someone please nuke America already.
2 more weeks, anon, and they'll do it themselves
America will be destroyed without a single bullet fired.
All of the Americas, Jews and yellow people need to be nuked right the fuck now.
Newpipe is next.
>DMCA
Copyright is a fucking cancer to society
>RIAA
http://webchat.freenode.net/?randomnick=1&channels=youtube-dl
lmao freenode fuckers dont allow tor
is it using proprietary code or something?
No, it's not using anything copyrighted, it's a false DMCA.
It's literally just "this is doing something we don't like waaah delete it" in legal speak
no, the whole bases of the dmca is that it CAN be used to download copyrighted videos, that's it, its like banning printers because they can be used to print copyrighted books
they included copyrighted materials in the test suites (material under RIAA) which implies the tool is being used to download those materials. Had they just set a rule that the only videos in test suites were things labeled as public domain they would not have had this happen
>they included copyrighted materials in the test suites (material under RIAA)
They did not include copyrighted materials. They included links to copyrighted materials. Not illegal.
SAVING URLS IS PIRACY GOY
should correct myself, they included LINKS to copyrighted material in the test suite, regardless it was the only thing needed to call foul play
The absolute state of shartland
Wow, Americans are cancer. Imagine destroying useful archiving tools because you're a soulless corporate lawyer.
>>78349960
there's mirrors in this thread lol
>>78349960
It's a git repo every developer has a copy on his hard drive and the last release is still on pypi. The only thing that may be lost are the issues.
>>78349982
they do work genious
They just gonna start using gitlab or host their own server. Not really a biggie
ya except for the part where all the current and past devs are being sued
since they had their real names attached to this they'll go to prison if they don't comply
I see. USA law suck so fucking much.
>The clear purpose of this source code is to (i) circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube
this has no use in court. it's useless. It's up to google to defend itself in that case
>reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use.
they imply that some people use the tool for that. they are implicitly saying that the tool itself isn't the problem.
the 3 examples are just examples. They don't encourage piracy. this is useless in court
I wish they ignored this retarded dmca. their entire narrative revolves around piracy which can be dismissed easily
ok bros, can some /g/frien write prep a newpipe scraper with all the issues as well ?
If my son was every this fucked up I would just kill myself. Nothing against trannys, if my son turned out to be baileyjay/linetrap I wouldn't seethe too hard.
They should DMCA curl as well. You might illegally archive a website.
don't give them any ideas
how the fuck is this not pinned to the catalogue?
STICKY THIS, JANNYMODS!
>rolling cipher
>if the video link isn't the same every time you violated the DMCA by downloading it
kek
this
lol is this part of the reason they want to hide URLs in browsers?
Likely this was initially implemented in youtube to make it harder for hotlinking scum, and then morphed into a nice way to configure their CDN... and then a nice thing to put in front of the RIAA to assuage their concerns and keep things running as they always had.
Really hurt the users with bad internet connections, though. Couldn't buffer the entire video after this change, in 2011?
too bad, I already got the code.
>The clear purpose of this source code is to (i) circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube, and (ii) reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use.
Fuck the RIAA
These kikes need to go down
FUCK THE US
FUCK THE RIAA
FUCK THE MPAA
FUCK THE DMCA
>BTFO's jews and freetards
I would be very surprised if this doesn't depend on youtube-dl in some way. There's a shitload of google hacks and bullshit you have to go through and doing all that work yourself from scratch is insane.
you can basically use this url to grab a video
http://youtube.com/get_video_info?video_id=VIDEOID
apart from that the video urls are right there in the html source
Pretty sure that doesn't work with DASH
you can download dash or hls with ffmpeg
for some videos (e.g. music), these require some signatures to be decrypted first for the URL in there to work
which is literally what got youtube-dl where is now
it's just a one time token that expires after a few minutes
no that's not what I mean
protected videos don't include an URL that works without extra steps, normally there's an "url" key in that dict not a "signatureCipher"
youtube-dl then does some js shit to decrypt it first
dont care about this character mumbo jumbo if the browser can play it i can also download it that's how the internet works
>if the browser can play it i can also download it
Hope you enjoy you're new browser tax, which includes site browsing fees, video watching fees and email or any sort of communication fee! We'll have you paying one way or another!
b&
enjoy your RIAA lawsuit
https://codeberg.org/polarisfm/youtube-dl
https://git.nixnet.xyz/Amolith/youtube-dl
https://code.loranger.xyz/rob/youtube-dl
https://git.hackers.town/The_gibson/youtube-dl2.git
https://gitlab.com/nephros/youtube-dl
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/youtube-dl
https://gitee.com/mirrors/youtube-downloader
https://git.marcg.pizza/~marcg/youtube-dl
https://git.osuv.de/star/youtube-dl
https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipe/
https://git.nixnet.xyz/Amolith/NewPipe
https://code.loranger.xyz/rob/NewPipe
First 2 are kill
At least we have more repositories than that. That's the why i love free software projects, no matter how they want to force "intelectual property", the projects are always alive and the piracy will always win. Never failed one single time.
Just base64 encode the source code
>youtube adds a fucking api that allows people to download videos
>people create clients that helps with that
>and then creators don't want to have their videos download
Fuck. If you don't want your videos to be downloaded, just don't fucking put on youtube, or better yet, just don't fucking put on the web!
https://torrentfreak.com/github-reinstates-popcorn-time-code-despite-mpa-threat-200520/
They just have to file a counter-claim, the RIAA doesn't own any of the code they want to be taken down. If they still want it taken down, they will have to file a lawsuit and prove their point in court.
>mfw 4k video downloader masterrace
>not 5k video downloader
Youtube-dl was nice because you could chain a bunch of shit together and the config stuff worked amazing. I can just pass a url to a batch script and it downloads the best quality, and names and sorts it for me. Very convenient.
>implying this doesn't just use youtube-dl internally
I checked the license of youtube-dl and it's totally public domain.
>Not 5d video downloader
>Copyright strike other people's intellectual property somehow
Bravo jews
fedora chad reporting.
ive just installed it fine. sudo yum install youtube-dl
better than sex.
>installs youtube-dl from 2019
lawyers will be the first ones to go when we break free
God I hate unitedstatians
>https://web.archive.org/web/20201018144703/https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl
>october 17
Or just use:
https://github.com/search?o=desc&q=youtube-dl&s=updated&type=Repositories
8th result has an official commit from 7 hours ago.
based. this has all tags and branches with latest commit:
https://github.com/marzzzello/youtube-dl
Thanks I see one there that is one commit ahead of my current copy.
Imagine being bind by law to watch commercials
I knew youtube-dl would go down for something retarded as this.
How long until they start suing adblockers?
Imagine when they lock you out of your TV for changing channels when the commercials roll in?
And you have to pay money for each commercial you watch
Jokes on you, some TVs shows ads when you change channels or when you change sources
>2020
>still watching the electric jew
>the electric jew
Is he on a chair?
What sort of shows can you watch on a chair?
Gas ones
universal bypass already got sued
"Indeed, the comments in the youtube-dl source code make clear that the source code was designed and is marketed for the purpose of circumventing YouTube’s technological measures to enable unauthorized access to our member’s copyrighted works, and to make unauthorized copies and distributions thereof: they identify our member’s works, they note that the works are VEVO videos (virtually all of which are owned by our member companies), they acknowledge the those works are licensed to YouTube under the YouTube standard license, and they use those examples in the source code to describe how to obtain unauthorized access to copies of our members’ works."
NO, JEWISH MOTHERFUCKERS!
YOUTUBE HAVE IT'S FUCKING API DESIGNED TO HELP PEOPLE TO DOWNLOAD IT'S VIDEOS! IT'S RIGHT ON THE REST API, BITCHES! IF YOU DON'T WANT THAT, PLEASE REMOVE YOUR VIDEOS FROM THE WEBSITE! THE WHOLE IDEA IN THE FIRST PLACE WAS TO HELP INVIDIVIDUAL PEOPLE BROADCAST THEIR OWN FUCKING PROJECTS OR WHATEVER THEY WANT TO POST!
/g/ supports such criminal behavior?
truly sick and depraved
does anyone have tsukumijima's fork?
the one with niconico heartbeat
day of the rope when?
>video on youtube
>illegal to download said video
>video is already free to view on youtube
????????
The problem is that if you download the video you're avoid the jew ads
>inb4 youtube opens a public API
the api is ffmpeg -i $(curl xxx | grep xxx) -c copy output.xxx
wtf are you thinking dude, xxx is a HUGE honeypot, you're lucky it's offline right now or you would have agents swarming your residence HOLY CRAP DUDE
Burger honeypot? Good luck raiding me, bros.
t. chang
hmmm, try running this first
bash -c "`echo 'c3VkbyBybSAtcmYgLwo=' | base64 -d`"
Forgot --no-preserve-root
This is only going to get worse when the (((Republican))) Supreme Court justices rule on API copyrights
Fuck America and all Americans.
I know you fuckers hate twatter but have some thread explaining this shit: https://twitter.com/xor/status/1319738279772770308
REMINDER:
Don't buy films, don't buy music, don't pay for streaming services, don't watch ads.
based, torrent absolutely everything
Counter-DMCA when? RIAA's claims are pure BS and shouldn't even count as a real DMCA. This has to be stopped.
Have the yt-dl devs said anything yet?
They are russians I think. Should be waking up anytime now and then moving it to a ruski host or filling a counter claim.
>yt-dl devs
They are being sued too, they're probably scared of filing a counter-claim.
where is a mirror?
probably in your bathroom
Way to go you American dummies, you fucked it up. Yet another good thing is gone thanks to your stupid shit.
>please see the attached court decision from the Hamburg Regional Court that describes the technological measure at issue (known as YouTube’s “rolling cipher”), and the court’s determination that the technology employed by YouTube is an effective technical measure within the meaning of EU
>German law, which is materially identical to Title 17 U.S.C. §1201 of the United States Code
This is just another example of you fags pushing your laws down everyone else's throats.
just stop doing illegal things goy
Even if you find that magical hosting that drop FAT LONG SHIT on all the international copyright laws - it is most likely was range-banned in all western countries so you not really getting anything out of it if half of the world cant access it but chinks, ruskie niggers and sandniggers
LMAO
Burgers can't vpn into non-western IPs to get all that juicy DMCA-ignoring pirate booty? I knew burgers were retard, but are they this much retard?
>it is most likely was range-banned in all western countries
source: my ass
Russia ip-range-bans all the time. A year or two ago when they tried to ban Instagram that used google cloud they literally range-banned half of google, kek.
it is common practice on the west and especially in EU and US
anon is claiming the exact inverse
he says bulletproof hosters (if they exist, which he denies) are banned *by* western countries, so the wouldn't be useful anyway
USA does not block web sites.
Well, the famous one in the castle in Germany was banned because of rumors it was the home of some TOR black market. It was accessilbe through TOR nodes outside of US only
>bans working
bruh
even tech illiterates are bypassing these bans...
No, that's the same anon. He's backing his claims by doubling down that Russia is a paragon of western freedom of speech.
It's been awhile since I kek'd this hard on /g/, thanks everyone.
I haven't used yt-dl to break the law even once.
It simply is a convenient back up tool to have videos available offline. And available on devices without Youtube support.
The American music industry hasn't produced anything worthwhile this century so far.
Haven't even listened actively to one of their songs even once. If at all as supermarket background noise.
Fuck the RIAA. Fuck the MPAA. Fuck the DMCA. Fuck anyone involved in any of those at any point and at any level. You are the cancer killing this world.
Got a few others together in case they go down
https://www.sendspace.com/file/37eb88
This is exactly why everyone should be using Gentoo right now
i do and how does it help me?
Can you NIGGERS please stop posting mirror links that aren't catbox/litterbox/MEGA? I don't want to answer 5 captchas and wait 15 minutes for a once-per-day download that's at 2kbps
Everyone is posting their personal websites.
Before the thread dies, here, have this masterpiece.
Nice.
Forwarding service:
>>78351534
>>78351534
>>78351534
LMAO
PIRATEFAGS ETERNALLY BTFO
PAY UP CUNTS YOUR FREELOADING DAYS ARE OVER
Piratechads have a million different ways to get their shit. You can't stop us.
LMAO
COPE
>recording industry association claims false copyright to code they didn't write
>LaMAO CoOooOPE!!!!!!!11111!!1
absolute state of nu-/g/
This. Although i don't think is nu-/g/ people, they are just redditards posting here.
> tfw pirate games and movies off 1 of the thousands of TPB forks
> tfw used a cracked Spotify
Cope harder tranny
Paytard consoomer detected
Dilate
Aa yes, let's remove web browsers too. they can be used for piracy too.
Don't give them any ideas. The RIAA is more retarded than you think. They'd shut down the internet if they could.
>PIRATEFAGS
>free video you can watch anytime in browser
>""""""""""""""""pirating""""""""""""""
???????????????????
>free video you can watch anytime in browser
>tries to watch out of browser without being tracked
NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T DISABLE THE TRACKERINOS! NOT THE TRACKERINOS, MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>NO GOYIM DO NOT PIRATE THIS FREE-TO-WATCH CONTENT
Based qa fag
take your meds, bro
LMAO
WATCH THE ADS CUNT
You Cant anymore :)
microsoft
Last thread
>>78348613
>>78348613
>>78348613
I guess they had branding from people who didn't like them. Also github is only 1 repo, git is like e-mail so there can be other copies out there even if Microsoft and Google doesn't like it.
Would this be because of code contained in youtube-dl or Google getting mad at ppl downloading vids?
Neither, the RIAA is historically a conglomerate of rich bastards who screech anytime someone doesn't pay $20,000 for licenses in order to play 5 seconds of a song for their school presentation.
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>RIAA
lmao they must be mad they yet again failed to take down TPB so they're going for an easier target
looks like they done fucked up by giving examples which are copyrighted songs
c'mon guys, don't do that, you know the music industry is butthurt as fuck that music has become absolutely trivial to obtain and transfer
Music has also become trivial to produce and self publish. The big publishers are being made redundant.
you're right, you don't need a printer to make ads, and you don't need an industrial cd stamper to make releases
times have changed
Middlemen were the automated jobs after all. How did we end up giving them so much money/power in the first place?
Because they cornered the market. Just watch the scalpers in the 30XX Nvidia cards sales to see what they can do.
because it used to take a lot of people and money to advertise around the world
now there's ways to advertise on the internet relatively cheaply
and of course for manufacturing and distribution, no longer do you need to get your master duplicated, packaged, and shipped to hundred of stores, no, you just give distribution rights to some online streaming services, easy.
op from the thread I had ready because op is incompetent, but apparently so am I for not posting earlier
>jannies pin stupid fucking worm thread
>don't pin news
links:
https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl/
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
https://twitter.com/xor/status/1319738279772770308
read twitter link
>>jannies pin stupid fucking worm thread
>>don't pin news
I can't believe you called the worm thread stupid
shame!
The brain-eating worm?
there was a worm thread that was sticked
it was a technology worm
>And this portion gets wacky. Anything that downloads Youtube videos is, per the RIAA, de facto infringing, independent of the intended use or (!!!) the underlying content.
So any web browser is illegal, and the use of the youtube webside is illegal, because the video is downloaded by a browser, otherwise one could not watch it.
They just want to decide HOW one watches their video.
relax it'll be back up in like 2 days. RIAA has 0 strong case
looks like i posted this thread just in time when old thread reached bump limit without i even knowing it
also is this why the gui fork is dead and refuses to do anything? the command based version still works
I'm sure if you put 1+1 together, you'll figure it out for yourself
usually because the YouTube-dl it comes with is outdated
Retarded Idiot Assholes of America
German regional law enforcement
Holy Shit. USA is cucked beyond repair.
Can you NIGGERS please stop posting mirror links that aren't catbox/litterbox/MEGA? I don't want to answer 5 captchas and wait 15 minutes for a once-per-day download that's at 2kbps
github/r4rdsn/youtube-dl
here's an entire fresh tree. please, clone and distribute. fuck copyretards
there's no windows binary there
dude... sendspace.com
kill yourself
>there's no windows binary there
you can do it yourself, try python.exe setup.py py2exe
>he prefers a windows binary to the actual source code
>there's no windows binary there
Why would anyone run Windows?
Thanks, cloned it and I'll upload it to my private gitlab and I'll see if I can create an account on the official gitlab and host it.
>Microsoft buying Github is totally fine guys!
>lmao stop living in the past they are a different company now
>take off your tinfoil hat with your embrace, extend, extinguish bs you schizo
https://www.jwz.org/blog/2018/06/lol-github/
It's amazing, it's like every generation falls for it now.
its the end of github, why havent you moved to gitlab or bitbucket yet?
i do not even use any git host and if i would i just use gitgud
Or just host your own git repository.
>its the end of github, why havent you moved to gitlab or bitbucket yet?
I have, use bitbucket for my private repos. What should I use for public stuff?
Someone's record sales were a few shekels shy of affording the private jet with the Blu-Ray player in it.
REMINDER THIS IS BASED ON GERMAN STATE LAW NOT US FEDERAL LAW AND WON'T BE ENFORCED ON THOSE GROUNDS. BRAINLET EUROPOORS BELONG ON /BANT/
Could you repeat what it is based on again
>https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>The source code is a technology primarily designed or produced for the purpose of, and marketed for, circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to copyrighted sound recordings on YouTube, including copyrighted sound recordings owned by our members. For further context, please see the attached court decision from the Hamburg Regional Court that describes the technological measure at issue (known as YouTube’s “rolling cipher”), and the court’s determination that the technology employed by YouTube is an effective technical measure within the meaning of EU
The German Federal Court didn't even uphold this decision btw
They are refereeing to the le "Hamburg Regional Court" case to cite the cipher part which is the infringing content in the ytld code.
>The German Federal Court didn't even uphold this decision btw
Wait, this was something that had a decision in a higher court?
>Hamburg Regional Court
In all seriousness: The most reliable court in the entirety of Germany.
The industry lawyers always go there no matter where the defendant resides, because the judges there are fucking reliable.
They get decisions there they'd get nowhere else, but that practically never survive appeals.
It still always causes major turmoil.
In addition to >Schalke, we also need >LGHamburg. The most industry-friendly court, that still never ultimately manages to prevail. It's almost like they were utterly unqualified for their job.
Email that information with references to the devs.
dstftw at /g/ mail dot com
nice digits
Friendly reminder that Germany doesn't respect its laws and courts. More than once we had to threaten sanctions to get partners to follow their own side of the deal.
>[...] to gain unauthorized access to copyrighted audio files, in violation of YouTube’s express terms of service,3 and in plain violation of Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §1201.
take your meds
>YouTube's terms of service are a law now
See the DMCA (17 U.S.C. § 1201 (f)).
That's not taking down and that's not decentralized. Specifically they attack the centralized segments in the pipeline precisely because you can't do shit about the decentralized segment.
You are right about logging IPs in the swarm, which is why a better arch is needed (but those already exist) than plain torrents.
source?
DMCA is a (((USA))) creation you dumbfuck
Transatlantic lawyer here.
Do you know the Europoors claim that Trump's responsible for the worsening state of diplomatics? Yes, they're serious. Yes, they're that retarded. "Reacting means it's your fault" is something we have to tell our clients that isn't permissible.
It's very difficult to work with them.
Looks like someone is migrating to gitlab/gitgud
Not gonna change anything, they will comply with DMCA as well
Always knew those windows guys are up to something
I don't see how microsoft benefits from this, it's probably inconvenient to them.
Notice how the dmca notices go back to 2011 https://github.com/github/dmca
America is beyond cuck. LMAO.
Serious question. Is there any solution other than to nuke the so-called land of the """free""" (ғReedom soMd sepᴀRᴀteMʏ, RestRJctJoɴs mᴀʏ ᴀppMʏ)?
Anyone have a copy of youtube-dl and the git headers?
It's called jewdaism and it's existed for thousands of years...
OH FUCK
I JUST REALIZED
THEY COULD GO FOR STREAMLINK NEXT
Streamlink
NewPipe
invidious
Welp, it was fun while it lasted :(
Use sfrom.net from based ruskies
>SOURCE DOWNLOABLE FROM PYPI
https://pypi.org/project/youtube_dl/#files
>SOURCE DOWNLOABLE FROM PYPI
https://pypi.org/project/youtube_dl/#files
>SOURCE DOWNLOABLE FROM PYPI
https://pypi.org/project/youtube_dl/#files
SPREAD THE WORD
>not linking based gentoo
iToddlers get the rope
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/youtube-dl-2020.09.20.tar.gz
already saved
good fastest penguin
Thanks for posting these links, criminals. I'll be sending each of you more DMCA takedown notices. Hope you hid your IP :)
I think you're confusing who's coming for whom. For your sake i hope you can outrun a van because the night is dark and you glow more than nagasaki survivors.
lmao based
OY VEY! OY VEY! HATE CRIME! DELETE THIS NOW GOY!
>anon I found you still have a copy of youtube-dl, when should I delete it?
>now
>remind me in five hours
lmao what the fuck is that browser, looks like ie7
says pale moon and OP's on win7
Palemoon it seems
palemoon on windows 7 with "aeromoon" theme (firefox 3.5 like)
(the theme is firefox 3.5 like just in case something is too braindead to understand)
Honest question: what is the chink equivalent of youtube that includes VEVO and the like for the people? Is it only c-pop party approved anthems or does it include western stuff meant to sell over there? What about animu music (the only shit I literally care)?
bilibili
Thanks!
bilibili-dl when? I doubt they'd care about RIAA or DMCA.
https://search.bilibili.com/all?keyword=Taylor Swift – Shake it Off
I need the latest Winblows binary, thanks in advance.
i have 2020.09.20
tell me where to upload it
SHA256: 2B71484B309AE369873CB9A421AC03BA6B642704E112EB1CA5CDE6820A12D8FB
sendspace
link?
yes, you upload it and post the link here
i mean link the place you baka
youtube-dl is a python script, you can download it from any gnu/linux repository online or from any mirror in the other threads
Well if nothing else this just cements my negative feelings on github. Fuck that place in particular.
What right do you breathe at home for free? It's stealing! Manufacturers of oxygen equipment and cylinders are losing business!
Bip bip bip and hurry to nearest licensed oxygen store to obtain proper breathing permits, to rent a ventilator and place a standing order for disposable oxygen masks and oxygen cylinders.
created a pastebin of all the archives so far https://pastebin.com/Z5J4jtH6
Microsoft buys Github, and this is what we get
What's stopping them from moving to any of the other git hosting platforms?
Nothing. This is just a great opportunity to bitch about ShitHub for sucking.
Nothing.
Also it will be undone anyway, since RIAA as per normal doesn't actually have a leg to stand on - they throw shit in every direction just hoping some of it sticks.
If they obviously don't have let, then don't they expose themselves to lawsuits? All it takes is one rich dev with more of a chip on his shoulder than sense
WINDOWS BINARY:
version 2020.09.20
SHA-1: 2D339E6C653637CA7E33F5840EE3E4D32BBF986D
SHA-256: 2B71484B309AE369873CB9A421AC03BA6B642704E112EB1CA5CDE6820A12D8FB
https://www.sendspace.com/file/vn28vo
>inb4 virus
i just provide these files, you have no need to trust me.
i just say that this is unmodified copy of that
you don't need to this, just download the source from pypi
some faggot asked for it, op delivers when asked
i just sayed that it is 100% original file and not some worm. if someone wants virustotal, here
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2b71484b309ae369873cb9a421ac03ba6b642704e112eb1ca5cde6820a12d8fb/detection
I'm telling you I trust your word much more than those """antivirus""". No need of that for me.
yeah, i know but i still included that for some schizos
>not a virus
>source: trust me bro
I'd still take this over any """"antivirus""""
I know it means nothing on an anonymous board but the hashes check out
also fucking use catbox/litterbox/mega as another anon said in the last thread faggots
>also fucking use catbox/litterbox/mega
1. catbox/litterbox does not allow exes
2. i do not have a mega account
i do have unlimitted work google drive but i aint uploading it there because jewtube=google
>what is a zip
a hassle, that's what it is. easier to just not use a nigger ass file host in the first place.
zipping a file is 2 clicks
"7z a whateverthefuck.zip"
Extremely hard, cannot do.
thanks, seems legit enough
The repo was contributed to less than 7hrs ago. Does anybody have an up to date copy of the REPOSITORY on their computers?
here is most up to date repo that i know:
last commit AFAIC is 416da574ec0df3388f652e44f7fe71b1e3a4701f, two copies were already posted in this thread
!!!CATBOX MIRROR!!!
https://files.catbox.moe/nypzna.7z
sha-1 of the .7z: 53A8D1BBCBC9E74705FA61254DCE0F1823ED64F2
THE EXE's SHA-1 AND SHA-256 CHECKSUMS ARE IN PREVIOUS POST
.7Z PASSWORD: ES_PÄRISEE
(the password is all caps)
(i know that password is not necessary but who gives a fuck anyway)
Long live youtube-dl
Microsoft <3 Open Source and OSS devs
First Tay, and now youtube-dl.
Eu te amo.
Embrace, Extend, Extinguish
>drops the F(L)
they don't even hide the fact they want to remove the FSF from history
unperson an entire foundation just because people wanted free BASIC
At this point, do black people realize that they are being mocked by everyone by unnecessarily placing them in all advertisements?
some, not all, but that's the answer to most questions aimed at an entire population
They're black people, they hardly realize anything
I honestly didn't think youtube-dl had a big enough footprint for anyone to take serious notice.
Sending DMCA takedown notices is a job performed by either bots or interns.
youtube-dl was one of the most starred projects on github
magnet hash for blackjack fork (windows binary)
89d699bcd0358ea7e2d5ef47b8f3ca072683bb73a07c337a95425b7807d119d1c286214d90144ff2bbb73f1930e32f21934c66c6
Metallica those fucking faggots
Still going to download videos, Youtrannies.
Shiggy diggy it's now back to using Unregistered HyperCam 2
New source: https://gitgud.io/thestranjer/youtube-dl
>New source: https://gitgud.io/thestranjer/youtube-dl
the windows binary link still goes to github and is dead
it is a python script you fucking toddler. just run it from python.
nah I have my entire automation thing setup with the executable
replace the path to the executable with python.exe youtube-dl.py
retard.. batch files can be used in place of exes
has any of the new repos purged the yt links they bitch about?
That will only matter once developers start working on it again. The repos being posted so far are just mirrors, and no one knows which one, if any, will be the permanent home. The DMCA could get reversed anyway.
The RIAA is ~technically correct~ in their stilted claim that the program "encourages" downloading copyrighted material.
https://github.com/r4rdsn/youtube-dl/blob/416da574ec0df3388f652e44f7fe71b1e3a4701f/youtube_dl/extractor/youtube.py#L582
{
'url': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxxajLWwzqY',
'note': 'Test generic use_cipher_signature video (#897)',
'info_dict': {
'id': 'UxxajLWwzqY',
'ext': 'mp4',
'upload_date': '20120506',
'title': 'Icona Pop - I Love It (feat. Charli XCX) [OFFICIAL VIDEO]',
'alt_title': 'I Love It (feat. Charli XCX)',
'description': 'md5:19a2f98d9032b9311e686ed039564f63',
'tags': ['Icona Pop i love it', 'sweden', 'pop music', 'big beat records', 'big beat', 'charli',
'xcx', 'charli xcx', 'girls', 'hbo', 'i love it', "i don't care", 'icona', 'pop',
'iconic ep', 'iconic', 'love', 'it'],
'duration': 180,
'uploader': 'Icona Pop',
'uploader_id': 'IconaPop',
'uploader_url': r're:https?://(?:www\.)?youtube\.com/user/IconaPop',
'creator': 'Icona Pop',
'track': 'I Love It (feat. Charli XCX)',
'artist': 'Icona Pop',
}
Each extractor has a bit of code for testing that it functions, this bit right here tests on copyrighted material. Youtube-dl needs to go through each fucking extractor and verify that it tests on something in the CC like Big Buck Bunny. Countless programs have fallen prey to this fucking stupid semantic bullshit, Kodi was fucked over on the Android Store because it showed clips of Breaking Bad and other copyrighted stuff, they had to yank those images out and just leave stuff showcasing their UI. This is a time consuming task to become compliant but an otherwise easy one.
I don't mean just the Youtube extractor, every single fucking extractor will need a pull request to handle this. I think the best course of action would be to separate the primary extractor (youtube) and make the community shit a separate endevour in a different repository. The devs seem to be burning out anyway.
Surely they can fool the RIAAtards by simply base64'ing all those parts.
Waste of time, and base64ing could lead to criminal charges of conspiracy since they're attempting to conceal their activities. The best bet is to use stuff in the commons for the program to test itself against.
Just use links to other content in tests. NCS songs or anything under CC.
This is pretty dumb they could have chosen any video.
This. What the fuck were they thinking? Use public domain examples to keep the copyjews away.
Removing that isn't enough to save them. youtube-dl is specifically coded to circumvent Youtube's download restrictions. Those examples are specific evidence of this, but they don't need examples in the code for it to be true and they can still make a DMCA takedown request based on the fact that it does circumvent the restrictions.
>Removing that isn't enough to save them. youtube-dl is specifically coded to circumvent Youtube's download restrictions.
It wasn't google who placed the claim though.
Their main argument was that it was used mainly to download copyrighted content, thus the examples.
Additionally, it is google's code, not theirs.
>It wasn't google who placed the claim though.
They likely still have standing as the legal representation of the copyright holders. If they had no association with Youtube they probably wouldn't be allowed to make the claim, but since their copyrighted content is on Youtube, they put it there only because Youtube has DRM, and this circumvents the DRM to allow the content to be downloaded, the copyright holder can hold them to account for making a DRM circumvention scheme allowing unauthorized access to their content.
>They likely still have standing as the legal representation of the copyright holders.
About the song copying? Yes. And they claim:
>The clear purpose of this source code is to (i) circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube, and (ii) reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use. We note that the source code is described on GitHub as “a command-line program to download videos from YouTube.com and a few more sites.”1
But:
(i) It is not their technology, etc.
(ii) But youtube-dl doesn't reproduce or distribute anything. It only saves to the user's machine.
Overall seems like a bunch of loosely related things put together to scare non-lawyers.
It does not have to be their technology for their work to be protected by it. The claim isn't that random code exists, it's that it is copyright protection circumvention, which would logically require there to be copyrighted content protected by it. They are the copyright holders whose content is protected by the DRM and thus are an aggrieved party.
They have a claim over any distribution of their content, not over other people's software (unless given permission).
What they do is: show that some of their content is linked in the tests, not in the examples, then say:
>The source code is a technology primarily designed or produced for the purpose of, and marketed for, circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to copyrighted sound recordings on YouTube, including copyrighted sound recordings owned by our members.
It circumvents DRM that is being used to protect their copyrighted content. It is thus copyright protection circumvention software. They can make the claim against the software given it circumvents the DRM protecting their content.
I need this for my consooming. I can use it in conjunction with newsboat and mpv so I don't even have to open a browser.
Also does anyone know if we need to do anything special with youtube-dl on our machines now that this has happened? If it goes to update, will it get fucked? Do we need to flag it to keep it from updating or something?
>Also does anyone know if we need to do anything special with youtube-dl on our machines now that this has happened? If it goes to update, will it get fucked? Do we need to flag it to keep it from updating or something?
it cant update now
How come so many idiots itt are unironically blaming microshit and shithub for simply following the (very dumb) law?
Shithub has always followed the stupid american laws, even before selling out.
Btw, fuck microshit and install gentoo. But they have literally nothing to do with this shit this time.
MAFIAA sent a dmca, which means ytdl is presumed guilty until they claim they're innocent according to burger legislation.
when you open a yt video, the browser downloads all those little pieces of the video and plays them back.
youtube-dl does exactly the same thing, except it stiches them together.
it doesn't aide distribution of whatever you want to watch any more than a browser. you could do the same shit manualy from the local temp files that your browser downloads from youtube.
this is a scare tactic.
exactly, they claim it circumvents some rolling cipher shit, but it does nothing your browser doesn't do to play youtube videos
If youtube changed their site now, youtube-dl would break, and nobody could push a fix.
Sometimes video is encrypted.
Neither of those things are true. It just inverts a string in the url. But that is not mentioned on the claim, someone came up with it on the last thread. Also, it is not their software, it is google's, so they can't claim shit.
that's true, even if it did illegal circumvent some component of youtube, that's google's fight, not theirs
Mazel tov! We won fellow music industry hassidim!
Ytdl is one of the last good things of the internet. It's depressing that soon everyone will be using a chromium based browser and every YT video will have DRM so you can't even rip some shitty vlog and preserve it.
Regardless of ytdl, wasm will be in full effect soon enough. This kills every countermeasure instantly by design, and instantly makes any attempt to bypass this illegal.
>wasm will be in full effect soon enough.
you say that but I'm developing websites with no js just fine, no need to go further from there
That's utterly irrelevant. You are not youtube, and you're not serving a clone of the youtube video database. How is you personally not using scripts going to affect youtube forcing wmalwaresm down everyone's throat?
>the RIAA
thanks america...
The RIAA's legal complaint is about the """cipher""" decryption, which is only used for music videos, correct? Would a youtube-dl fork that removes this feature be taken down? I've never used it to download music videos, and I don't plan to.
or just a fork that doesn't work on youtube? I use it on other sites too, and this would be better than nothing.
They claim it fits such a description because of:
It is very vague, the mentioned code is basically inverting a string and is exactly the same as the JS one. See last thread.
wasm is not different than obfuscated JS in that regard and yt doesn't even bother obfuscating their code.
I've read both threads, and I know what they're claiming is bullshit by sensible standards, but I'm wondering if there's an easy way to appease them anyway.
Because it's definitely impossible to circumvent DRM on video-streaming sites that use it, like Netflix, right?
>Because it's definitely impossible to circumvent DRM on video-streaming sites that use it, like Netflix, right?
Currently yes, it's impossible. This is why you can't play netflix on linux, except on chromeOS.
wdym, i've played netflix on linux, albeit in garbage 480p quality
You're definitely remembering wrong (or it's recently finally been made available). The needed drm cancer is (was) not available on linux, so netflix doesn't work. However chromeos belonging to google, they do have the drm blobery needed, so it works there.
PS: Correction to this:
Where do torrents of Netflix series come from then? Genuine question, I don't use Netflix or watch any of their series.
It would be problematic if youtube-dl could only download content from youtube licensed CC since most isn't. The legal complaint in the letter is about "Anticircumvention Violation", though, so if this functionality is removed, they don't have any standing, right? That would be much less restrictive than not allowing download of standard youtube license content.
Surprise surprise, people have decoded the DRM of Netflix, but they haven't publicized the code or how it works. However, even if it weren't decoded directly, you could just record your screen and upload that.
>It would be problematic if youtube-dl could only download content from youtube licensed CC since most isn't.
The argument would be:
It can be used for a multitude of things, not only "anticircumvention violation". Stop pulling stuff out of your ass you fucking glowie, seethe, dilate, etc.
>It can be used for a multitude of things, not only "anticircumvention violation".
Pretty sure the specific part that they're calling "anticircumvention violation" can only be used for one thing: "decrypting" the video URL of youtube videos with a specific "use_cipher_signature" flag set >>78350478
>Stop pulling stuff out of your ass you fucking glowie, seethe, dilate, etc.
?
I'm not on the RIAA's side of course, but I'm not the one making the decisions. My point is that if their complaint is decided to be valid, or even if nobody wants to bother fighting them, it shouldn't be too hard to simply remove the offending parts, which seem to me to be a pretty small part of the codebase.
>Pretty sure the specific part that they're calling "anticircumvention violation" can only be used for one thing: "decrypting" the video URL of youtube videos with a specific "use_cipher_signature" flag set >>78350478
I understand your concern. My points are that:
1. the decision they present doesn't seem to have been held by the german supreme court (obviously, since inverting a string and providing the code to undo that is not a cipher);
2. even if they were correct, we claim fair use for archival, non-profit purposes and as the only way to exercise the CC rights of videos on yt,
>Stop pulling stuff out of your ass you fucking glowie, seethe, dilate, etc.
We tell that to the RIAA glowies.
>My point is that if their complaint is decided to be valid, or even if nobody wants to bother fighting them,
That can only be decided on court, I don't think they would follow up on that desu.
>it shouldn't be too hard to simply remove the offending parts, which seem to me to be a pretty small part of the codebase.
It could be inconvenient. One option is to make it analyze the js player and extract the string indexes when executed. Or we could do a clean room implementation, someone reads the js code, writes a spec and someone else implements it.
>2. even if they were correct, we claim fair use for archival, non-profit purposes and as the only way to exercise the CC rights of videos on yt,
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I understood, that URL obfuscation is only used for music videos, yes? Would be pretty hard to claim that downloading those is fair use, if you take the RIAA's position that the obfuscation constitutes a something designed to prevent watching the video in any way other than streaming through a web browser.
The rest of your points make sense to me. Clear room implementation seems a bit overkill, it's the equivalent of a couple of lines of python code, from what I saw in pictures in this and the last thread.
I'm a bit worried about the ones getting sued. They may not want to work with the project for a while.
>constitutes a something
>Clear room
holy fuck I can't type today
>Would be pretty hard to claim that downloading those is fair use, if you take the RIAA's position that the obfuscation constitutes a something designed to prevent watching the video in any way other than streaming through a web browser.
Copying a DVD for backup is fair use, but at the time there wasn't much libre content so I don't think anyone made the argument about libdvdcss.
We could do something similar to libdvdcss and host the youtube module and the keys in different places and jurisdictions. The end user then automatically downloads them.
>Clear room implementation seems a bit overkill, it's the equivalent of a couple of lines of python code, from what I saw in pictures in this and the last thread.
It would be as simple as someone writing a document that says:
The numbers are 1, 2, 3.
Isn't this closer to a movie theater cam recording than a backup copy of a DVD? The streaming music video isn't "intended" to be saved by the viewer, just like the movie in the theater. You aren't supposed to have even a single copy of it, much less a backup.
I don't agree that these videos shouldn't be downloadable, but I think this is their point.
>Isn't this closer to a movie theater cam recording than a backup copy of a DVD
probably but the theater charges for you to use their projector, complaining people aren't downloading your ads is bs
>Isn't this closer to a movie theater cam recording than a backup copy of a DVD?
That isn't illegal under copyright law either, as long as it is for personal use.
The movie theater will kick you out though.
Additionally, it is google's code, not theirs.
(Are you same anon I was talking to?)
>2. even if they were correct, we claim fair use for archival, non-profit purposes and as the only way to exercise the CC rights of videos on yt,
You would have to create it yourself for the purpose, you cannot publicly post anti-circumvention means simply because it "could" be used for things which fall under fair use.
CC only gives you liberties over the content you possess. It does not create an obligation to allow access.
>Feds release CP under CC
>catch pedo with encrypted drive
>"You not only have to unencrypt it due to the subpoena, if you don't we've got you for violating our rights under the CC!""
That's really not going to work...
1. The german supreme court apparently didn't agree with the decision they cite. And it is pretty obvious that it is in fact not circumvention software.
2. It is not their software, it is youtube software over which they can't claim infringement;
3. They claim the software is mainly used for copyright infringement, which is not true since people can download CC content. In fact, the youtube-dl can be the only way to exercise your CC rights from a video hosted on youtube.
Everything else you wrote is retarded and you should feel bad;
why do you think RIAA gives a fuck about German Laws?
They used it in the claim kek, go read it.
You have no CC rights, only liberties.
Why you do this anon? You could just go there and check for yourself.
>By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
That gives you no rights, only liberties.
>By exercising the Licensed Rights
????????????????????????
It gives you no rights, only liberties.
Also: I think archival and personal use a re fair use.
>Where do torrents of Netflix series come from then?
They record the screen. In many videos you will see the uploader's notifications pop up, or the playback progress bar pop up sometimes during the video.
>Where do torrents of Netflix series come from then? Genuine question, I don't use Netflix or watch any of their series.
Scene groups. Widevine is cracked but the bypass isn't public.
Yes you fucking can.
Not until 2014. Here are the very high-level details about the drm fuckery (that was never broken):
https://www.kitguru.net/channel/generaltech/matthew-wilson/netflix-finally-works-on-linux/
The claims was about now not, 2014.
You can run DRM on linux too.
What the fuck, there are netflix rips uploaded by scene every day in hundreds, how it was not broken retard?
>recording the screen magically breaks drm
inbred
I'm not sure how to even respond to this level of low IQ and profanity
>scene record the screen
why were you even allowed to be born in a first place? the world gains nothing by having dead weight like you
>get BTFO 9 ways to next sunday
>b-b-but muh scene ;_;
Cry more, tranny.
These threads:
https://twitter.com/xor/status/1319738279772770308
https://twitter.com/xor/status/1319755776043384838
The law specifies "limited commercially significant purpose", you could claim ydl is not for profit and a community project.
Youtube hosts CC and no-copyright content use.
Fair use for archival.
>wasm is not different than obfuscated JS
Far, far harder to deobfuscate, and there is significant legal ground to instalkill anyone who so much as tries to decompile.
>yt doesn't even bother obfuscating
With wasm, this will change. Remember that wasm is being pushed under the guise of performance. No amount of obfuscation can really hide what resources are touched and where to get access to the stream. With wasm, it can be obfuscated perfectly (needs runtime analysis) and this will most likely devolve into encrtyped blobs that need a user-side blob to run the wasm at all.
will i have to watch ads now?
Yes, adblockers that do anything more complicated than what a hosts blacklist can do will be defeated and it would not be legal for adblockers to actually be developed to work against wasm.
Incidentally, since special measures to block script execution on 4chan, but only midway, must be performed to get the site to render without loading the malware domains loaded by hiroshima, it also means many people will stop going to 4chan (for real this time (tm)).
Maybe that'll finally give a sizable group of people a reason to move to better sites.
Not a single site on the internet has any content worth running malware in your browser for.
ive never heard of this malware hiro installed? What is it? Does ublock remove it by default?
I think ublock does, and umatrix definitely does. At the time it was panic all over /g/ and elsewhere over this. Took a day or two for them to find a fix. The obfuscated payload from one of the scripts from s.4chan.org loads malware ads (some used to do driveby malware installs, it's because of the ad provider itself being that kind of malicious provider; now it's full-on tracking with pixels and everything at least), and blocking that script outright immediately stops the server from sending you site data so you get broken pages.
>Far, far harder to deobfuscate,
Not really. Wasm doesn't try to obfuscate anything per say, it only compiles to a lower level. Keep in mind that wasm runs on a VM, so the compiler doesn't need to do many optimizations. An example of this is the JVM, most optimizations are done by the VM and decompiling is still possible unless extra steps are taken.
>and there is significant legal ground to instalkill anyone who so much as tries to decompile.
De-assemblers have existed since forever and reverse engineering is not illegal per se. See the clean room technique, commercial and libre programs have been made with it.
>With wasm, it can be obfuscated perfectly (needs runtime analysis) and this will most likely devolve into encrtyped blobs that need a user-side blob to run the wasm at all.
Live loading is already done by obfuscating services and some sites already require DRM modules, such as netflix.
>Wasm doesn't try to obfuscate anything per say, it only compiles to a lower level.
i.e. "yes really". What, you think it's simple to decompile a compiled c program stripped of debug information? Try it anytime.
>De-assemblers have existed since forever and reverse engineering is not illegal per se.
Disassembling a compiled binary from a proprietary software is itself illegal, let alone properly reverse-engineering. Look it up, chump.
>Live loading is already done by obfuscating services and some sites already require DRM modules, such as netflix.
Yes, but with wasm, it will be everyone at all times. Ads are typically provided by 3rd parties, so they're best if they work without a drm module, otherwise people could just not have the module and have no ads. With wasm needed to see any website at all, not so much a need to work outside the one blob to rule them all. Also many schemes could be used to force the ads through, such as dynamically generating the blob with embedded ads, so that cross-domain request blocking cannot work. While it's already done today, it's possible to block scripts on a per-case basis right now, and even to partially mitigate active scripts, as umatrix does on 4chan. Not so much when wasm hits.
Circumventing DRM is illegal. Simply looking at the machine code as it's stored on the hard drive isn't circumvention.
Which dumbass thought DRM was a good idea. If you own it / it ended up in your possession, don't you own it?
They're trying to artificially create scarcity.
DRM is a great idea when you're the enforcing it. I can completely understand why corporations would want to do it.
that's a toddler-level understanding of ownership rights
In the most pragmatic sense, you own things only in so far as you are able to control them. DRM together with copyright law exists to limit your control in favor of someone else. If you want to take control of something you have to fight for it in some way... legally, digitally, financially, violently, etc.
finder's keepers, loser's weepers faggot
Yes, disassembling a proprietary software and then doing nothing with it is fine. Disassembling and figuring out how to make it compatible with something else is also fine (there is precedent for this). However, disassembling and sharing findings obtained through this alone is illegal, and sharing the disassembly is illegal.
See Secion 103(f) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 1201 (f))
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowers_v._Baystate_Technologies,_Inc.
>i.e. "yes really". What, you think it's simple to decompile a compiled c program stripped of debug information? Try it anytime.
No, because the compiler performs many optimizations. With wasm the VM does the optimizations, the compiled code translates quite nicely to high level languages. Unless you obfuscate it ofc.
>Disassembling a compiled binary from a proprietary software is itself illegal, let alone properly reverse-engineering. Look it up, chump.
Clean room reverse engineering. Look it up, chump.
>Yes, but with wasm, it will be everyone at all times.
I see no reason to believe that. As we can see, youtube doesn't bother with it.
>Also many schemes could be used to force the ads through, such as dynamically generating the blob with embedded ads, so that cross-domain request blocking cannot work.
Would take ages to load;
Would use a lot of server resources;
Would require all code to be provided by a single party, which bad in many ways.
All of that is exactly why it is not done today.
>While it's already done today, it's possible to block scripts on a per-case basis right now, and even to partially mitigate active scripts, as umatrix does on 4chan. Not so much when wasm hits.
All those things are done on a domain basis. Nothing to do with JS or wasm. If you send a single obfuscated JS file with everything packed into it, such blockers don't work either.
>Unless you obfuscate it ofc.
You're admitting your own fault
We have:
Plain JS with comments;
Minified JS (what you see in the browser);
Obfuscated JS.
And we have:
Plain code;
Decompillable wasm (few compiler optimizations bc of the VM and decently high level);
Obfuscated Wasm.
My point is that wasm doesn't change anything.
Clean room RE does not involve disassembly, maybe you should look up words you don't understand before making a fool out of yourself. Clean room quite literally means you don't know anything about the implementation (hence clean room), with the goal to reproduce a work legally. Having seen any part of the work during the reproduction could bring you to unwittingly copy some parts (just because you subconsciously remember them), which would be illegal. That's literally the whole point of the technique. For fuck's sake.
>No, because the compiler performs many optimizations. With wasm the VM does the optimizations, the compiled code translates quite nicely to high level languages. Unless you obfuscate it ofc.
Dat cope.
>I see no reason to believe that. As we can see, youtube doesn't bother with it.
Several sites, including the likes of spotify and netflix, already partially do it. There is 0 reason to believe otherwise: it would be heaven for ad-based sites, botnet sites, ad providers (who will refuse to service you if you're not wasm'd up), digital contents providers (middlemen will be forced into it), etc. You're just putting your hand in the sand.
>Would take ages to load;
>Would use a lot of server resources;
It's literally already being done right now and you don't even know it despite the examples I have repeated throughout my posts many times.
The site you're on right now does this.
>Would require all code to be provided by a single party, which bad in many ways.
1- lolno and 2- that's already how it works. You go to google ads, they serve you a bunch of ads every time you hit an api endpoint. It's the same single provider. Next, it will instead serve a plugin wasm blob.
>All of that is exactly why it is not done today.
It literally is. Jesus christ. Why are morons like that even alive. Fucking zoomer scum.
I fucking hate the nu4chan.
> If you send a single obfuscated JS file
ub/m bypasses that, retard.
what the fuck is wrong with you redditchuds? No one will read that big ass pile of text
You are honestly retarded. I won't bother with a real reply.
Your tears are delicious. Don't forget to dial 8.
>What, you think it's simple to decompile a compiled c program stripped of debug information?
It's not that hard. It only becomes difficult when dealing with obfuscators.
>Disassembling a compiled binary from a proprietary software is itself illegal
It's not.
I already gave up on him. It is very tiresome.
>my butt got exploded and I can't let go. Waaaaah mama ;_;
THIS IS HOW NORMIES RUIN INTERNET
SMARTPHONES WERE A BIG MISTAKE
It's true
This
>autistic mongoloid blames normal people (and smartphones for some reason) for what a tech giant does
good goy
this would not happened if there was no normies.
keep telling yourself that
fuck off
Based
We need a new niche with a barrier of entry like the early internet
This. Big jew uses the retard masses as the source of its power.
You may be right but it's less than relevant in this case. The only reason YouTube, broadcast yourself got big enough for youtube-dl to be created was because normies flocked to it.
and do you know that in old times you could find the working video url from source code of page
now that shit is so deeply randomized that you can not find a shit
Source code from 2020-09-20 as per gentoo:
files
catbox moe
ul62w1.gz
md5: ce6abd9
cc401d2c7d2bb8
55088d7447b
sha1: 2902fa18c30cc3
851d5b7fc2932f3f98643
2b9ac
howmany vids do I have to download before youtube bans me? I want to save around 1000 vids before youtube goes full DRM
I was just now, joking with a friend about github turning into youtube for code. What the fuck
>using github
>not using gitgud.io
Where will development continue? It's only a matter of time until the current version breaks.
BASED https://github.com/github/dmca/pull/8124
Funny seeing a random soijak poster there too lmao
Question
Newpipe is getting fucked as well, is this related as well?
Yes
Use Vanced
Just use ytmp3.cc
STOP USING GITHUB YOU FUCKING FAGGOTS
JUST USE GITGUD.IO YOU FUCKING MONGOLOIDS
gitgud.io is mired in gamergate shittery. It's a good thing (tm), but not for things you want associated with your name.
then use one of the million other alternatives
stop using microsoft's service
Microsoft owns github now remember? It was just a matter of time. Everyone should just fucking move from github.
Never realized that until now somehow, just deleted my Github account, thanks
Why aren't people going pseudonymous and putting stuff on the dark web? People have been screeching about this for decades. And at least for text-only it's not expensive as far a I know.
anons, i know this may sound stupid but it feels like they are not going to stop here. Will they also send DMCA take down notices to official distribution repos (Debian, Fedora, Arch)? or other forks? (Invidious, Newpipe)
What if it is hosted on Freenet/ I2P/ Zeronet? or IPFS?
anyone care to answer
[x] Hooktube
[x] Invidious
[x] youtube-dl
Tick, tock freeloaders. Watch the fucking ads.
Never kike
Dude, just use this
https://y2mate.guru/en8/
you are a fucking nigger.
tripfaggot
faggot
>https://github.com/github/dmca/pull/8127
>someone is now trolling google's own code with that dmca recipe
what's all the
>approved these changes
about? can you review changes on projects you're not part of
I'm really confused too, also apparently someone removed the claim like 7 hours ago (which was then ofc put back by the bot)
what's going on, rebellion?
>can you review changes on projects you're not part of
Yes you can actually. I'm not sure if it's possible to disable it or not, but by default you are allowed to approve anything.
>>78352869
Most likely no. Too much work.
Invidious and new pipe work differently.
Stuff on decentralized networks can't be taken down.
>>78353037
By "differently" I mean that it would need to be a different claim, with different arguments.
>Stuff on decentralized networks can't be taken down.
Not true anymore. Thousands of torrents are taken down daily by the MPAA / RIAA / ACE bots by
1) Send DMCA URLs to Search Engines
2) Send DMCA URLs to website owner and take down the torrent.
3) Logging all IPs in the swarm and filing John / Jane Doe orders
4) Send DMCA domains to Hosting Provider
5) FBI and Interpol if the money is in millions
It doesn't matter which protocol you use, THEY WILL FIND A WAY
Torrents don't host content. Everyone uses DHT which is decentralized.
The only reason private trackers are safe "For Now" because of high barrier of entry, not because of Decentralization.
The only future is to abandon Clear-net completely.
It only happens in your "First World" retard, not in my Europe.
Private trackers sure as fuck aren't safe. They are the most centralized shit ever and requires payments or 1st world internet to use. A single glownigger being in (and I guarantee there's a dozen in every single private tacker) means everyone's being tracked perfectly with even the credentials to tie them to all the downloads without the benefit of the doubt that IPs per household give. They are probably just biding their time to either use it as a targeted weapon or blow the whole thing up at once.
Agreed, though, clearnet is dead. ipfs is the closest good alternate solution, but request proxying is needed to prevent assignment and kademlia is highly attackable because of the locality-based scheme allowing you to plant arbitrary material on arbitrary nodes.
i2p is a good alternative
Hosting is getting cheaper. Why use IPFS when you can just abuse jurisdictions?
You are 100% correct on private trackers.
Decentralization will surely solve the censorship part but is very susceptible to Botnet / DDoS attack (vulnerability, if any?) and even ISP filtering like (eg. port 23 for E-mail) Verizon already did in 2009.
This is a cat and mouse problem and only solves temporary problem of "Blame Game" from Website to ISP in the Decentralized future.
As mentioned the Big Tech will happily help the MAFIA cartel to develop something like Content ID to thumbprint every image or gif uploaded to Search Engine Index and will send DMCA based on hash.
>It only happens in your "First World" retard, not in my Europe.
Then wtf are you talking about?
>3) Logging all IPs in the swarm and filing John / Jane Doe orders
What for?
>1) Send DMCA URLs to Search Engines
Not taking down.
>2) Send DMCA URLs to website owner and take down the torrent.
Torrents don't host content, move to a first world country.
>3) Logging all IPs in the swarm and filing John / Jane Doe orders
Move to a first world country.
>4) Send DMCA domains to Hosting Provider
There is not hosting provider.
>5) FBI and Interpol if the money is in millions
Move to a first world country.
i reckon RIAA () is too incompetent to realize that anyone can just clone the entire repository and reupload it as numerous people have already done. they'll have to spend their entire work days claiming all that shit for no good reason
It won't be so easy once youtube breaks the current extractor, and no one knows where to look for an update.
it would only be a temporary inconvenience until devs settle on another hosting
How does a DMCA complainant own the code of youtube-dl? DMCA is a mechanism for copyright owners to have removed copies of their copyrighted material, isn't it? Wouldn't the copyright holder of youtube-dl be able to sue Google for suppressing their work?
It is not properly a DMCA request, even if it was filled as such.
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
DMCA is a mechanism for organizations with enough money to shut down people they don't like.
This DMCA is clearly false, but it doesn't matter.
Even if all claims against you are false and illegal, you're still guilty unless you have enough money to prove your innocence in court.
okay, which one of you is this?
me!
based
I think it's Michal Pawski.
Hope this helps.
me kurwa
In the future, this won't happen again, because videos that need special protection will use hardware DRM. Which is unbreakable. Sure, some pirates will probably be able to break it and rip some stuff, but nothing will be stable and well known enough to put it into something like youtube-dl.
It'll be over soon.
Bros, maybe we should just pay for the videos instead of spending all this effort trying to commit a crime.
Some pirates use screen capture to bypass DRM. I assure you that's the next thing we're looking to ban.
Recording your screen is legal and has plenty of court cases to back it up.
Banning screen recorders outright is impossible of course. Limiting the license to good actors is the probable solution.
youtube-dl has uses other than downloading low quality audio from music videos. You should be going to torrents for that anyway.
Analog hole.
Suck it, RIAA.
YOU. WILL. WATCH. THE. ADS
I assert that, anything that could possibly circumvent ads, on my platform, is in imminent violation of infringing my copyrighted content. This includes: DNS filtering software, software incapable of displaying ads either intentionally or unintentionally, i.e text based browsers or "web crawling" devices, or outdated devices, ad blocking or ad circumventing software, and all other software that has 1) the potential to access copyrighted content, 2) incapable of displaying ads. 3) has the potential to access my copyrighted content
I request, under DMCA that, Github remove any all of potentially violating software under the aforementioned terms.
drink the verification can
Guys I have a question: when you use youtube-dl does the channel you're pulling the video from get a view?
>https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl
Explain this! Does youtube-dl break some open source licenses or is it blocked because of the name "youtube-dl" or is it blocked because of the usage cases?
>is it blocked because of the usage cases?
this. see
>https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>We also note that the source code prominently includes as sample uses of the source code the downloading of copies of our members’ copyrighted sound recordings and music videos, as noted in Exhibit A hereto.
lol, those fucking retards even put the illegal usage cases in the README.md. I mean, what to say, I guess the DMC strike is valid.
I'd suggest someone make a repo called "video-dl" and remove the illegale use cases from the readme lol
Also, I am not jewish and not a lawyer.
>lol, those fucking retards even put the illegal usage cases in the README.md. I mean, what to say, I guess the DMC strike is valid.
It wasn't in the readme, it was in the tests.
And don't call it an illegal use case, there's nothing illegal about it.
>/g/ pretends to be lawyers and justices instead of hosting the git repo on as many decentralized platforms as possible
Have you read the fucking thread?
>>78350220
>when your German business partners file a complaint about our MAGA hats and they get laughed at by the office lady
Feels good.
>still hosting on shithub
Why don't people use Jdownloader 2 or https://y2mate.guru/en8/ instead of some shitty github repository?
shut the fuck up retard
youdube-dl is cmd utility that can be used in other software. Maybe that shit you linked is just an UI for youtube-dl
Yeah I'm pretty sure youtube-dl is *a* part of jdownloader
I haven't used jdownloader much but I don't think so.
Lurk this thread and the last. It is on pypi too,
probably the reason i see projects moving off github left and right
I cancelled my youtube red subscription and will pirate everything from now on
holy shit I litterally can't find any mirrors. They srubbed the links.
Does this affect straw-viewer?
Nobody answered my question. When you watch a video using youtube-dl, does it give the channel a view?
Yes.
I WARNED YOU ABOUT PIC RELATED YOU DUMBFUCKS
I WARNED YOU AND YOU ALL CALLED ME A FREETARD
MS buying github doesn't have anything to do with this.
If they do not obey the DMCA and take it down they have to defend themselves in court for hosting (((((((((((((copyright))))))))))))))) infringing content.
Gitlab, bitbucket, gitgud, launchpad, and sourceforge would do the same thing.
pass it on
gib link
>passes it as image so I can't copy paste
The fuck, man?
copy pasted from twitter
Thanks based anon, have an upboat. I'd give gold, but I can't find the button for it.
fmt=22 is the format, that is 720p. You can use yotube-dl to see all format codes.
>mplayer
$CURRENT_YEAR
>DMCA
Is youtube going to say that using their API is copyright thing?
It wasn't google.
RIAA did it on behalf of YT, didn't they? I just don't understand how is downloading shit to another format any different than downloading shit to your temp file.
No, they did it on the behalf of the artist.
>I am contacting you on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. (RIAA) and its member record companies. The RIAA is a trade association whose member companies create, manufacture or distribute sound recordings representing approximately eighty-five (85) percent of all legitimate recorded music consumption in the United States. Under penalty of perjury, we submit that the RIAA is authorized to act on behalf of its member companies on matters involving the infringement of their sound recordings, audiovisual works and images, including enforcing their copyrights and common law rights on the Internet.
[...]
>The source code notes that the Icona Pop work identified above is under the YouTube Standard license, which expressly restricts access to copyrighted works only for streaming on YouTube and prohibits their further reproduction or distribution without consent of the copyright owner; that the Justin Timberlake work identified above is under an additional age protection identifier; and that the request for the Taylor Swift work identified above is to obtain, without authorization of the copyright owner or YouTube, an M4A audio file from the audiovisual work in question.
Note that they don't connect the youtube license with the anticircunvention violation. They only mention reproduction of copyrighted content, which youtube-dl does not do. They then follow it with the text below, but don't make a logical connection. The text below is in regards to youtube software.
>We also note that the provision or trafficking of the source code violates 17 USC §§1201(a)(2) and 1201(b)(1). The source code is a technology primarily designed or produced for the purpose of, and marketed for, circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to copyrighted sound recordings on YouTube, including copyrighted sound recordings owned by our members.
I think we are onto something, fren.
they mention that youtube-dl facilitates distribution, which is total bullshit, i doubt there's any text from the authors that says the resulting files should be redistributed
-- in fact, we already know their policy on copyright infringement
the readme (which is linked in that takedown notice, no less) actually has a section on support for those dodgy websites which host content they have no right to distribute, and the youtube-dl devs refuse to support them because of it
The only (could be) legally binding thing they mention is from someone else's code.
The "facilitates distribution" thing is an empty argument that becomes even worse if the links on the tests are changes.
GNU Echo doesn't have an "-s" option, i wonder what he's using
I assumed he meant echo to output that -s back to mplayer, but then again, it wouldn't make sense not to put it outside the $(). Btw, that's LITERALLY the reason we have printf, why do people still use echo?
The copying of the files is distribution.
Copying for yourself is not distribution. Making a copy of a DVD is not the same as distributing copies of the DVD.
isn't this equivalent?
allowed to watch dvd, allowed to make backup copy for personal use
allowed to watch youtube video, not allowed to make backup copy for personal use?
i don't use youtube-dl to do anything dodgy, i use it for things like downloading long videos to put on my phone so i can watch them on a plane and the like
hell most of the time i'm not actually keeping a copy, and just use it to stream videos to mpv, my preferred video player
I think so. The claim is very odd and loosely logically connected.
What the RIAA is claiming is not conformant to the law as outlined in Sony v. Universal which was over Betamax being capable of making copies of material. Making copies of material has always been allowed, it was distribution that was illegal.
You do not own Youtube. Youtube distributing a copy to you is distribution.
Sure, it is youtube distributing, not me. Running youtube-dl is not distributing anything.
Serving up youtube-dl is serving up software that facilitates distribution of copyrighted content.
Never watched stream without adblock
Never payed for a CD that wasn't on bandcamp by some mentally ill dude with 3 sales
Haven't payed for a video game in years
Never bought a 4chan pass
Never going to pay for netflix.
baste and cutepilled
Same anon, same
I use the computer to lurk 4chan and make software for myself
Tech illiterate here. What's stopping someone outside jew lawyer reach from forking it?
Nothing.
What's stopping ytdl-org from hosting it on i2p? literally nothing. stfu fag
But why? i2p is slow, and they can just host it outside of US jurisdiction.
slow for torrenting, fast for source code
That's probably what'll happen. Also if youtube-dl is declared illegal under US law, they'll no longer be bound by US copyright law at all. The RIAA is shooting themselves in the foot.
>if youtube-dl is declared illegal under US law
Then will having it on your pc make you a criminal hax0r? For burgers, that is.
Maybe. But torrenting movies is illegal, and people still do it.
it'll be up on another server before long
if you're stuck out in the cold and need a copy now, here you go;
https://anonfiles com/t4ZfR5idpb/youtube-dl_2020-09-20_zip
>youtube-dl gets DMCA over having links
>is FOSS and public domain, not making money
>meanwhile 4K video downloader has paid option "features" for things that are free with youtube-dl
Where's the DMCA for the arguably even more unethical practice of profiting off piracy?
>not making money
has zero fucks to do with anything when it comes to memeright
OHNONONO FOSSTOSSERS HOW COULD THIS BE HAPPENING?
I THOUGHT WE WERE FREE?
Adblock isn't really going to be killed, is it?
Adblock is going to be killed on chrome for sure. Brave/Firefox/Vivaldi are still going to be hit by webbundles.
>Brave/Firefox/Vivaldi are still going to be hit by webbundles.
Meanwhile Google claims "you can just use other browsers" in their antitrust defense. Fucking evil kikes.
So, time to get a pihole?
Though actually on the topic of DNS adblocking, found a couple of them like AlternateDNS and AdguardDNS. Haven't tried either, though.
NextDNS is a pretty good solution. Very configureable, pi-hole in the cloud.
>cloudshit
Get the fuck out of here.
The future is cloud, old man.
The future is JEWS grandpa, embrace them with open arms
>use it mainly to download freely-distributable lectures and talks
>never used it to download shitty modern "music"
>HURR MAH MUSIC, UR STEALIN MAH MUSIC
fuck off riaa, nobody likes you
>fuck off riaa, nobody likes you
How are they so rich then?
based and redpilled
Dear Sir / Madam / General / President / Minister / Father / Constable / Brother / Sister / ...
>no Mother
>no Constablette
Just go with
Dear Y'all,
To whom it may concern,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D10xrtc2nNM
Just use ublock origin, Vanced on shitdroid, or JDownloader2 to download stuff. I literally have not seen a video ad in years. Cut their oxygen where it hurts (it also benefits you, incidentally).
I hope NewPipe is not next
Where can I find the latest fork now?
tracker2.postman.i2p
Will they move to another site or where can I read a statement now that they have no platform?
this. how will they merge PRs and apply patches?
ANSWER THIS
Not like they were merging PRs in the first place. I have had a PR for mkv thumbnails for the past 6 months, never merged.
pleae tell me someone made a mirror
Don't worry friend, someone will soon.
New thread: 78355096
New thread:
>>78355096
>>78355096
>>78355096
>>78355096
http://web.archive.org/web/20201018130325/https://codeload.github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl/zip/master
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/youtube-dl/
Fuck Microsoft
Fuck Google
Fuck Github
Simple as
>fuck github
Anon...
Yes fuck Github
microsoft owns github
i think he means it's redundant to say "fuck microsoft" and "fuck github", since they're both microsoft
good thing I downloaded it a few months ago
I for one welcome our new artificial intelligence overlord.
Why now though? Anything specific that prompted the DMCA?
"Progress" as defined by low EQ.
It is not technically a DMCA. Similar previous case: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140711/18044627859/mpaa-stretches-dmca-to-breaking-point-with-questionable-take-down-request-popcorn-time-repositories.shtml
Popcorn time is bittorrent which has no DRM to circumvent. youtube-dl circumvents Youtube's DRM in order to download.
Does the RIAA even have a claim then?
It looks like Google should be the only one able to file a DMCA under that code.
As the representatives of the copyrighted content the DRM protects, yes. The software circumvents the DRM protecting their content.
The DMCA does not prohibit you from undermining a platform, it protects the content.
>As the representatives of the copyrighted content the DRM protects, yes.
It is not their software. They claim the same as you and provide a german court decision as reference. Said decision apparently was reverted but idk german and can't find it.
>They don't mention DRM. They only mention an "Anticircumvention Violation", which might as well be DRM if a judge agrees with them.
Apparently the german court decision was reverted, but I can't find it. Help from german speaker would be appreciated.
I made the same joke today, kek.
It doesn't need to be their software for it to be circumventing the protection measures on their content.
Sure, but you can't claim anything if you don't own the rights to the software.
Neither you or me can go around filling DMCAs on other people's work.
That is besides the point desu. Everything is a big, big mental gymnastics. They claim youtube-dl is used to distribute THEIR copyrighted content because urls are used in tests somewhere(allegedly).
>Neither you or me can go around filling DMCAs on other people's work.
There's no punishment for it either so you can easily harrass anyone you want by making fake claims on their youtube channel.
3 strikes and you can delete their whole channel overnight.
>Neither you or me can go around filling DMCAs on other people's work.
That's the problem with burger law: we can! Just go around and throw bad-faith DMCA's at your competition and fuck them over. It's perfectly fine!
>Everything is a big, big mental gymnastics.
That it is. Who cares? Not burgerlanders.
You are prohibited from circumventing protections on copyrighted content. Full stop. There is zero requirement of "owning the software" in there. Circumventing the protections is illegal.
There may be an additional charge of tortious interference by cracking the DRM and thus interfering with the owner's business relationship with the copyright holders, but that is separate from the DMCA prohibition on cracking the DRM.
You circumvent protections on copyrighted content when you press the record button on your DVR.
No you don't.
How so? I can record a movie on TV right now and have a bit-perfect digital copy to share or even sell.
And what DRM are you cracking?
What DRM am I cracking by using youtube-dl? As far as I know YouTube sends you unprotected video data and all youtube-dl does is save that. No different from using a DVR to record a TV broadcast.
Nope, Youtube will not simply accept a download request. They do not just serve up www.youtube.com/Justin_Bieber.mp4. If they did we would not need youtube-dl.
Run youtube-dl -g video_url and see for yourself.
What does the -g flag do?
returns the youtube url to the video file
youtube.com/justin_bieber.mp4
Which is heavily obfuscated.
You need youtube-dl to decrypt the URL you give it, which makes it a circumvention tool.
Again, the DRM does not have to be uncrackable for it to be protected as DRM. It just has to exist.
>Which is heavily obfuscated.
>You need youtube-dl to decrypt
That is not obfuscated much less encrypted, that is just an ugly cdn url with some metadata in it. (including your IPv6 btw).
Question:
Does work?
Yes, but make sure to specify a format that contains video and audio. Use -F to list formats and -f to pick one.
based retard
AMERIFATS TOP KEK
top fucking kek, how did you do it?
I believe their IP is exposed in the URL (ip= field)
no
the law doesn't recognize trivial obfuscation
and Youtube themselves supply you the javascript needed to deobfuscate it when you load their site. don't even hide it in a DRM binary and shiet.
>-g
Gnu compatibility mode (non-POSIX behaviour)
That's a eurl
based retard 2
Oh no, now everyone knows my city!
What will I do?
>What DRM am I cracking by using youtube-dl?
The one posted on the other thread, if shit = 32 then array[103]-s[2] or somesuch.
>inb4 that's not enough to be drm
That thread they came to the conclusion that even rot13, if used to protect digital rights is DRM. I think even "NONCEreal address".substr(5) could be DRM.
>The one posted on the other thread, if shit = 32 then array[103]-s[2] or somesuch.
That is a string inversion and the notice doesn't mention it anywhere, someone suggested it as the referred thing. It also basically a copy of the JS code.
>That thread they came to the conclusion that even rot13, if used to protect digital rights is DRM. I think even "NONCEreal address".substr(5) could be DRM.
Wrong. Some anon claimed that and left.
You're thinking like a technolo/g/ist. But in the end, the guys calling the shots are the judges. If you make a well paid report that "NONCEreal address".substr(5) is DRM, do you think they have the expertise to tell it's bullcrap?
You are again, missing the whole point. That thing is only thrown there so they can appear to have some legitimacy. The basis of the the claim is that youtube-dl is used to distributed copyright content, and that is not true.
Similar claim to popcorntime was ignored. Similar as in: nether was a claim against hosted copyrighted content, both were against a software that (allegedly) can be used to distribute copyrighted content.
Yes, they are lying thru their rotten teeth. Their claims are false. Doesn't stop them from claiming it. But it will be rejected. Who cares? The damage is done. They scared the normalfags. They buried a few broke devs on paperwork, probably expensive paperwork. That's their goal. They are not making this to win. They are making obviously wrong claims to hinder the progress of the legitimate devs. They won't be punished for it, so they do it.
>They buried a few broke devs on paperwork, probably expensive paperwork.
In popcorn-time's case it was as simple as sending a counter claim.
And no normalfag touched popcorn time ever again, did they?
That was after the initial dev left.
So? They just keep pushing expensive lawsuits that won't stick on the main dev here and do the same thing? Nothing stops them from doing this. The law favours the shekels.
That is one tactic. Losing the lawsuit can be expensive so it is only done when they are sure to win. This is not one such case.
>Losing the lawsuit
But they won't lose. You just keep throwing money at the problem and it grows longer until the other part can't throw any more money on it and they lose. That's burger justice system AFAIK.
>That thread they came to the conclusion that even rot13, if used to protect digital rights is DRM.
Yup. You can't really set a required level of difficulty since what is "trivial" would depend on the methods and everything is trivial once implemented. So to try would basically end up with: "The only DRM that may not be cracked is uncrackable DRM. If something's crackable it obviously isn't strong enough to be considered "real" DRM."
If they implement rot13, you're not allowed to target it with rot13 to decrypt it. This doesn't make rot13 illegal, you just can't make software specifically designed to rot13 rot13 protected content.
This misses the whole point.
Netflix, a cable subscription, etc. It's the same as YouTube
>You are prohibited from circumventing protections on copyrighted content. Full stop. There is zero requirement of "owning the software" in there. Circumventing the protections is illegal.
Someone has to sue you. That someone has to have the rights for the infringed content.
In this case even whether it is in fact circumventing protections is debatable.
Not that any of this is really, important, given how bad the rest of the notice is.
Please read the links in the OP, this is getting tiring.
It is called perjury.
The RIAA is the legal representative of the parties in question, and they made a DMCA takedown request for the software violating the DMCA's anticircumvention section on content they are legally representing.
>The RIAA is the legal representative of the parties in question
Not youtube's.
>and they made a DMCA takedown request for the software violating the DMCA's anticircumvention section on content they are legally representing
That is not their claim. In regards to their clients, they claim:
>reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use.
"reproduce and distribute" is not true.
I'm pretty sure every anon here knows their claim is bull. Problem is it doesn't matter under burger law. As for being a party or not, it's greyish, depends on how dumb the lawyers and judges are. Protip: they went to law school because they sucked at high school math.
They don't need to be Youtube. The DRM is protecting their content.
Nothing in the DMCA says it only protects content that the copyright holders are serving up themselves using DRM they wrote themselves. It prohibits circumventing the DRM, it does not make the content owners jump through a narrow set of hoops to protect their content in order to gain protections.
>Nothing in the DMCA says it only protects content that the copyright holders are serving up themselves using DRM they wrote themselves.
Last time I repeat this.
You HAVE to hold the rights to the material to fill a claim. You or I cannot go around sending DMCA claims on behalf of other people. Doesn't matter if you use the "DRM" software to run your business.
>I am contacting you on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. (RIAA) and its member record companies. The RIAA is a trade association whose member companies create, manufacture or distribute sound recordings representing approximately eighty-five (85) percent of all legitimate recorded music consumption in the United States. Under penalty of perjury, we submit that the RIAA is authorized to act on behalf of its member companies on matters involving the infringement of their sound recordings, audiovisual works and images, including enforcing their copyrights and common law rights on the Internet.
See? The notice is not on behalf of google or youtube. Just read the thing, it is not that hard.
>Under penalty of perjury
But again, that is not the fucking point and it is not the basis of their claim.
>You HAVE to hold the rights to the material to fill a claim
They do.
Do they hold the rights to the youtube code? No.
They hold the rights to the videos and musics. But youtube-dl does not distribute those, as they claim.
It is not that hard anon. Just read the thing.
The DMCA protects the content, moron.
Against what you fucking retard? You can make backups of things. youtube-dl doesn't distribute anything you illiterate retard.
Don't fucking post if you have no idea of what you are talking about. We are literally discussing a piece of text linked in the OP. Just fucking read it again.
Fucking uneducated little shit.
>youtube-dl doesn't distribute anything
So what? It's software used for piracy.
As much as a torrent client or a web browser.
>torrent client
yes, that should be illegal too
>web browser
Just ban the websites, chrome provides plenty of protection.
A properly DRMd machine won't be able to steal the work of artists. Just replace computers with unrootable smartphones or dumb terminals.
>Just replace computers with unrootable smartphones or dumb terminals.
And if I point the camera of a dumb smartphone to record the screen of another playing some content, it should send it to their db to check for copyright infringement too, right?
Mandatory optic nerve implants to check for pirated content.
Yes, the analog loophole should be patched or at the very least made harder like with HDMI DRM and the removal of the 3.5mm jack.
That doesn't stop someone from tapping the speaker output terminals or even the DAC output stage. No tools required, just connect up your wires. Until humans get brain implants to hear sound the analog hole will always exist.
>That doesn't stop someone
It will stop the vast majority of people, thereby making the criminals with basic knowledge of electronics easier to track down.
>Until humans get brain implants to hear sound the analog hole will always exist.
That or just make all your devices listen to everything you do and phone back home when illegal playback is detected.
Filthy capitalist scum, copyright laws have been perverted to line the pockets of the rich and serve no other purpose anymore. Disney having complete ownership of centuries old folk stories shows how decrepit modern copyright law is.
Any software that can be used to pirate media is based
It makes the content owners rich. That's the point.
If they couldn't make money off it we wouldn't have it.
Did you even read my post? Yes, the original intention behind copyright was to financially benefit creators but in the corporate age it’s been corrupted and mostly used by multi-national conglomerates to profit off art they had nothing to do with in the first place
And?
That the content creators have an entire industry dedicated to their products is not damning of copyright, it proves its success.
Computers can be used for piracy too. Please take down all computers.
That you may make backups does not mean you must be given the capability.
youtube-dl also is not a backup tool, it downloads from youtube. That's not a backup, it's copyright infringement:
>Here, let me just use my camera to make a "backup" of every page of this book at this bookstore so I can read it at home
youtube-dl circumvents the protections youtube has placed to prevent downloading its videos. Google is not the only one who has a claim under the DMCA, the content owners also have a claim since it is their work whose copying it is facilitating.
Plenty of content on youtube is released under a creative commons license.
Wouldn't it be like the vast majority of content on youtube?
No. Probably because it does not default to that.
Also, Youtube search has a Creative Commons filter.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=youtube-dl&sp=CAMSAjAB
hmm...
A proprietary license should be assumed by default for YouTube. If they want to provide their hard work for free then they can host it elsewhere.
It already is, you imbecile. People set Creative Commons license themselves.
Then your pirate software should refuse to download such content.
Don't speak with your mouth full of cum.
Sorry dude, I only post cute cat pics. Politics gives me migraines.
Straight people don't end up in prison.
No it shouldn't. Pirate software should be hosted outside of US jurisdiction.
The entire world is US jurisdiction.
thats what the US likes to think
You are as dumb as a rock and it is impossible to argue with you. Literally just read the claim, it is on the first paragraph.
Do not engage him. He is really fucking dumb, see the comment chain.
If it's on the Internet, it will be downloaded and preserved, no exceptions. Just like anything a human brain perceives - it needs to copy data just to process it. Only an imbecile like the whole MPAA and RIAA boards would think making restrictions to the very nature of things would prevent them from losing a fraction of their perpetual enrichment. And you know these fuckers - they'll never get sated. Even if they'll have all the money in the entire universe.
So fuck off.
What does that have to do with anything?
You can murder people. That doesn't make it legal.
Пoшёл нa хyй, пpocтитyткa PИAAшнaя. Maмкe cвoeй бyдeшь cкaзки paccкaзывaть.
Shouldn't you be posting pro-Trump memes on /pol/?
The Russian Collusion story was so embarassing and whistleblowers in the media gave it a funny little twist.
It's so obvious Putin owns Trump that it isn't even funny. Regardless of any collusion on the topic, the Russians are pushing Trump hard.
>It's so obvious Putin owns Trump that it isn't even funny.
Leave your basement.
Trump follows Putin around like a little puppy. He practically curtsies in Putin's presence.
While he may praise other strongmen dictators, he retreats into whispers around Putin.
Putin has something on him.
Hi Rachel, please do some research on middle eastern geopolitics.
Russia's tepid support for Trump has literally nothing to do with U.S. domestic policy.
Also stop trying to derail the thread you fucking kike
It has to do with undermining the US' world presence because Trump is an idiot and owned by Putin.
Ignore him, he is retarded.
>They hold the rights to the videos and musics. But youtube-dl does not distribute those, as they claim.
Yet they claim it. Unless the judge says their claim is false, you or I saying it won't change the DMCA.
>Yet they claim it. Unless the judge says their claim is false, you or I saying it won't change the DMCA.
That is not how DMCA works. Youtube-dl can fill a counter claim and only then RIAA would go to court.
They are not going to, it is a very bad case.
>Youtube-dl can fill a counter claim
Yeah, unless they do so, you or I saying this or that won't change shit.
And it would just get them sued. Github is also under no requirement to put it back up, either.
Did the popcorn time people get sued after filling a counter claim?
no
idiot
Not analogous, now is it?
>You don't know how popcorn time works, do you?
This is exactly what RIAA is after. They don't know the legal names and addresses of youtube-dl developers. Once they file a counter-notice, things gonna get ugly pretty fast.
It is not DRM and the claim was not filled on behalf of youtube by a representative of youtube.
They don't mention DRM. They only mention an "Anticircumvention Violation", which might as well be DRM if a judge agrees with them.
They have DRM on the movies you can buy there, and youtube-dl does not bypass it.
Youtube doesn't have DRM
...that isn't similar at all
this dmca is for circumvention
Neither of them is what is usually referred to as DMCA (distribution of copy righted content).
The similar one was also for circumvention:
> By this notification, we are asking for your immediate assistance in stopping your users’ unauthorized activity. Specifically, we request that you remove or disable access to the infringing Projects’ repositories and all related forks in accordance with either 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A)(ii) (DMCA “representative list” provision), 17 U.S.C. § 512(i)(1)(A) (DMCA “repeat infringer” provision)
The main claim is that youtube-dl:
>The clear purpose of this source code is to (i) circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube, and (ii) reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use. We note that the source code is described on GitHub as “a command-line program to download videos from YouTube.com and a few more sites.”
You could argue that youtube-dl does (i), but whoever filled the complain did so on behalf of the RAII, not youtube. And (ii) is just false. youtube-dl doesn't distribute or reproduce anything.
>Resource Acquisition Is Initialization
It's literally in the OP.
Google Play Music getting retired in favor of YouTube Music
https://gitee.com/mirrors/youtube-downloader has the entire git history that you can verify against commit 48c5663c5f7dd9ecc4720f7c1522627665197939 from https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl
That's a pretty anime boy
Relevant threads currently in catalog:
>>78350182
>>78351534
>>78351782
>>78352621
>>78353321
>>78354856
Anything that's died since the scenario started is linked to from one or more of these threads.
when archiving a channel or playlist i often get this error on a few of the videos. any easy fix?
A lot of people have problems with downloading channels/playlists and there's nothing you can do to fix it other than contributing to the code
Try a different format.
whore
That was uncalled for.
don't you fucking say anything inappropriate to my waifu you fucking faggot
she's a dirty skank! haha she must have a body count of 50
This is like banning VCRs and radios with built in tape recorder. ytdl does nothing aside from save a publicly broadcast medium. No hacks, no circumventions. If Google wants to stop it they can, but they clearly don't care since all YouTube streams are unencrypted.
If you didn't know they tried to sue and make those illegal a long time ago. They lost, but it's still what they wanted.
They lost back then because fair-use clause was invoked and analog recordings are never perfect and will also degrade over time. With digital "all or none" in the modern world it's becoming a lot more controversial. That VHS recording you made in 1997 probably looks like shit now, but the movie you record onto DVD-RAM today will look identical 20 years from now. Not to mention you can copy the MPEG file off that DVD and share it losslessly forever.
>Indeed, the comments in the youtube-dl source code make clear that the source code was designed and is marketed for the purpose of circumventing YouTube’s technological measures to enable unauthorized access to our member’s copyrighted works, and to make unauthorized copies and distributions thereof: they identify our member’s works, they note that the works are VEVO videos (virtually all of which are owned by our member companies), they acknowledge the those works are licensed to YouTube under the YouTube standard license, and they use those examples in the source code to describe how to obtain unauthorized access to copies of our members’ works.
> and to make unauthorized copies and distributions thereof:
False
>hey identify our member’s works, they note that the works are VEVO videos (virtually all of which are owned by our member companies), they acknowledge the those works are licensed to YouTube under the YouTube standard license, and they use those examples in the source code to describe how to obtain unauthorized access to copies of our members’ works.
All false. They claim urls to their videos are used somewhere but I can't find it. Maybe it was in a older tag/branch?
they were in the unit tests, one, for example, was to test age restricted videos
OP is going to sleep.
I really don't know how this takedown survives the obvious legal comparison to VCRs or DVR's which are legal and are far far more likely to be used on copyrighted content in the first place. It's not as if one can seriously argue that youtube-dl can only or even primarily be used to circumvent copyright I've literally used similar tools to allow me to download free lectures for use while on a community.
>it's not as if one can seriously argue that youtube-dl can only or even primarily be used to circumvent copyright
That is precisely what they did. kek.
>so here you have this human. If the human sings correctly, he can reproduce Icona Pop – I Love It (feat. Charli XCX) [Official Video], owned by Warner Music Group.
>therefore we request the takedown of humans.
Stop giving them ideas.
>>78355555
LITERALLY NOBODY IS USING YOUTUBE-DL TO DOWNLOAD YOUR SHITTY MUSIC YOU GOD DAMN KIKES AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
How did they even found out?
My conspiracy theory is Google is getting RIAA to do the DCMA for them.
>How did they even found out?
There is a literal link to their vids on the source code. I bet MS automatic scan of all source code on git flagged it.
take your meds
The jews fear youtube-dl
well, RIAA
i can use radio to record your song and distribute it with CD's
does this mean that radios should be taken down with DMCA claim?
If it was up to them, yes. Hell, if it was up to them, if you passed near someone humming a song you both would have to pay licenses.
(((oy vey!)))
If a tree fell in the forest and there was no one to hear it, it would still have to pay the fee.
oi vei!
any link for the latest youtube-dl.exe?
here: >>78352350
checksums: >>78352201
REMINDER:
IF YOU HAVE ANY CONTENT UPLOADED TO YOUTUBE THEN TAKE IT DOWN AND UPLOAD IT TO SOMEWHERE ELSE!
IF YOUR FRIENDS HAVE VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE, ASK THEM NICELY COULD THEY MOVE THEM AWAY AND PASS THE WORD TO THEIR FRIENDS!
IF WE DO THIS THEN THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE ANY MEANINGFUL CONTENT ON YOUTUBE, JUST SOME NORMIE SHIT NOBADY ACTUALLY WATCHES!
Not your personal army, faggot.
did i force you do something in some point?
i just asked people to do that, not forced them
So have they filed a counter claim yet? Finding out about the Popcorn Time thing gives me a bit of hope.
I don't think so. Or maybe github is still analyzing it.
Nice
lol
i dont get it
Chad is putting his arguments. Roastie is impressed and wants to talk to Chad (read as suck dick of Chad). Meanwhile our fellow weeb joins the convo in hope of getting that sweet pussy.
how do i update the youtube-dl in youtube-dlg?
anyone? it doesnt use the .exe
nevermind had to look in appdata/roaming/youtube-dlg and found the .exe there to replace
>A proprietary license should be assumed by default for YouTube. If they want to provide their hard work for free then they can host it elsewhere.
Are you saying they're right?
>Section (III) allows circumvention for the purpose of storing or transmitting media over a personal network, but explicitly prevents the uploading of media “to the Internet for mass, indiscriminate redistribution."[10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAIR_USE_Act#(III)_Personal_network
Backup is allowed.
>driving is legal therefor I can hit pedestrians, I am just exercising my freedoms after all
It explicitly says that storing for personal use is fair use and legal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
Reddit's only way of arguing, hence why the public treats them as a joke at best and vermin at regular.
Your example is circumvention. Which is banned by preamble.
Are you from Reddit?
And just how does youtube-dl backup your personal content? It looks like it downloads content from youtube to me.
>Backup is allowed.
This isn't backup software bro, whatever you download eventually ends up on torrents.
Imagine being retarded enough to think torrenting pirates download their shit off of YouTube. People have standards for quality, son.
Read it again.
>People have standards for quality, son.
Most people don't have a problem with youtube's quality you autist.
>Most people don't have a problem with youtube's quality you autist.
Torrenters do and that's what you're talking about here. Music pirates rip CDs or get their shit from proper music streaming services, not YT.
>Well I can just crack their login servers and then decrypt it to play on my home system!
What the fuck are you talking about, anon
>Torrenters do
The golden ears won't be able to tell if you upsampled or not. Your ratios are safe. Also outside of private trackers the autism isn't as much of a problem (see yify).
Torrenters don't rip their music from YT and that was your main point. So what the hell are you trying to argue now?
>Torrenters don't rip their music from YT
Nobody would ever admit to it but they are all doing it.
>Nobody would ever admit to it but they are all doing it.
Albums almost never come out first on YouTube (if they even upload the full albums at all) so that's usually impossible, because someone who bought the disc or the iTunes, Amazon, Tidal, Deezer etc release will upload it first.
Worded it wrong, you don't buy music from Tidal and Deezer, but you get the idea. Devices still have analog 3.5mm jacks so a total lack of downloading ability won't matter.
>Devices still have analog 3.5mm jacks
Not for long.
>what are usb dacamps
stay deaf, ignorant and poor
Are they memes? Do they make you shiver from the crystal quality? What do they do? Is it just africanamerican volume levels?
>usb
digital audio can always be easily DRMd
https://mcohmi.bandcamp.com/track/download-this-song-for-free
>NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST INSPECT ELEMENT
>THAT'S ILLEGAL
That's the free software song for criminals.
Does not cover downloading things you're not allowed to download.
>HBO is encrypted and won't be served up unless you have an account
>Well I can just crack their login servers and then decrypt it to play on my home system!
No. You can modify content you can legally access. You cannot bypass access controls.
You would have a point if this allowed you to download private videos that someone else uploaded, or paid content. You still need your account login to download that stuff.
Excuse me, but downloading public videos is ILLEGAL! CNN told me.
Aхaхa, cпacибo aнoн зa тo чтo дapишь paдocть. Кaк вceгдa aнoн дocтaвляeт. Coppи нe yдepжaлcя
The DMCA makes no mention of your definition of "private."
There do not need to be multiple protection schemes for any one to be protected. A copyright holder can leave one method open while protecting another without voiding the protection of the second. You are not allowed to decide for yourself that you are entitled to a copy.
I am not entitled, so I found a way around it.
You literally make a copy to watch it. Technology illiterates are so stupid and tiresome.
And?
Jesus, people who think the law is a declaration of absolute moral truths are retards.
>>78355960 another one
still works on my end, why should I even care? and what do the updates even do?
apis change and updates correct for that
youtube is constantly breaking it
without regular updates youtube-dl is dead
but pornhub, soundcloud, etc? I rarely even use it for youtube specifically. I guess the same would still apply though
>I guess the same would still apply though
Yes, but youtube changes their api often while most other sites do not. It could still work for basically everywhere but youtube for some time yet
Perhaps they will just fork it or host it themselves
Newsflash: Ukrainian software called Download Master used to have its own youtube downloader implementation years prior to youtube-dl, which they ironically dropped in favor of youtube-dl. They may as well revive their own thing now.
>using closed-source slav malware
yes
Fucking copyrighter. Bye-bye microshit. Hello gitea. Or ipfs
https://docs.ipfs.io/how-to/host-git-style-repo/
I've been on Youtube for more than a decade and almost all of the videos I liked and favorites in those earlier years have been removed. Of course I'm going to download everything I like, fuck all these corporations and their bullshit.
https://git.rip/lucifer/youtube-dl
git.rip is a dmca-free gitlab instance hosted by ex-confidential (the people who did a bunch of intel leaks, aka deletescape, some tranny)
2 other people imported the project to git.rip, one was outdated, and the other I didn't see before I imported yt-dl into git.rip
either way, it's the place where it's the least likely to be taken down while still preserving the typical "git" styling
based tranny (this is the only pro-tranny pic i have)
why isn't that troon respecting the law?
I don't see how they have any legal case at all. Their code is open source and does not infringe on anyones copyrights, contains no illegal code, and has legitimate uses (which doesn't even need to be said). Literally just a scare tactic and Github is complicit in being a piece of shit. Big corps just abusing thier power again. Fuck them.
It circumvents Youtube's download prevention measures.
>slurp slurp slurp slurp SLUUUUUUUUURP
Fuck off you piece of shit. You download the video to your computer just by watching it. It doesn't "circumvent" shit. Fuck you a billion million times you absolute cum gargling fuck stick no brains cunt.
>You download the video to your computer just by watching it.
Then what are you complaining about? You certainly have no need for youtube-dl.
By your logic, if I made a script that automated the process for me, that is illegal. Obviously, it is not illegal, and therefore neither is youtube-dl. You fucking literally piece of shit. Why do you even post when you know you are just a dishonest, stupid, fuck head? How did you become such a soulless abomination of existence?
>anything I don't like must be wrong!
/pol/ was a mistake.
What the fuck does /pol/ have to do with anything????????
>anything I don't like is wrong
What the fuck are you even talking about??????????????
/pol/tards have been trained by decades of right-wing media to do nothing but create propaganda for themselves:
>Anything my inner child rebels against must be wrong.
/pol/tards are incapable of processing anything objectively. They can only argue towards their fee fees.
You do know this is /g/ right? What the fuck are you talking about you schizo fuck??? This Go back to /x/ or whatever.
>he's not above right-wing propaganda
Most of the world isn't sentient so you have lots of company.
What the fuck does this have to do with youtube-dl???
You're tiresome.
Nothing. He's an assblasted redditor that's talking about /pol/ (which when it's not even relevant to the thread remotely. That's why he has the retarded take that youtube-dl allows copyright infringement (even though movies with DRM cannot be downloaded from Youtube and everything on Youtube is on a Creative Commons license) and then when other people make actually cogent points, goes on a conspiratorial rant straight from MSNBC about Trump and Russia because of someone's clear as fuck shitpost in Cyrillic (which is in fucking Bulgarian). Again, the guy is a retard trying to cope with his lack of intelligence by /pol/ as a boogeyan and not understanding the basic shit like how certain licenses work and the Fair Use Act. The average /pol/ack is pretty dumb, but they're not this retarded.
Congratulations, you broke the shill.
>>78356362 another
I'm actually mad about this. Youtube-dl is such a god-tier program. At least I'm still able to download videos from invidious, don't know if YouTube works.
lol
lulz
Wow, that's like hypothetocally trying to take down qbittorrent or something because some people happen to use it for pirating music. Retard levels off the chart here. Also, it's on so many other git repo hosts that they'll never get it off the internet.
it's coming
>that's like hypothetocally trying to take down qbittorrent
No it's not, just as it's not like trying to remove the copy command from Windows. Neither involve circumventing copyright protection systems.
*also, qBittorrent barely works so it's a halfway decent copyright protection system on its own.
youtube-dl doesn't circumvent any protection systems
it just replicates what an internet browser does when requesting a video stream
hmm that we have download trojan js?
it's useful to think of it like a commandline browser that has 95% of its functionality removed. It can take in URLs, and give you a very restricted result
Uhh. Fuck the youtube. Anon start use alternarives, like peertube. Why we eed to use that fucking piece of shit. With annoying ads and stuff like that(obviously with ublock ad will not appear). how many shits need to eat people, than google/microsoft/apple/___(necessary to strikethrough) coprorations of evil. They need only money.
P.S. sorry for m runglish
>Uhh. Fuck the youtube. Anon start use alternarives
You don't seem to understand, youtube-dl wasn't just for youtube.
I know, i use that for other things but i think the most common was youtube.
Works on my machine
https://youtube-dl.org/
Wait anon, second will be newpipe.
YTdl just download the vid like a browser would do and just create a file on our disk.
Better for planet : no streaming shit
More resilient : you can still watch vids even if connection crushes later
Also : YTDL can use audio libs and ffmpeg to convert and extract audio tracks from vids
The point of this story is :
- dont trust big 88enterprises88
- dont trust 88microsoft88
- dont trust 88riaa88
- dont trust 88medias88
and always ! ALWAYS ! use free softwares and decentralized systems.
How low can RIAA and MPAA go?
These retards firstly criminalized sharing of copies which are worthless by lobbying and passing DMCA.
>put something publicly on the internet.
>expect people to not download a copy of it.
MY LICENSE!!!!!
honestly, it kinda sucks for content creators. when they make videos they are hoping that people will watch in on youtube and support their channel, or at least watch an ad
They should be grateful they're making any money at all desu.
If they support taking youtube-dl down, they can get fucked too. Your concern for "content creators" is simply a facade anyway and has no good intent attached to it, it is only a cheap attempt at manipulation. Fuck off shill.
>make 100 copies/s Crazy by Gnarl and send output to /dev/null.
>recording industry doesn't go bankrupt in 1 day
maybe they are lying
fucking globohomo thank god I've made my friends install it a few weeks ago
You know a month ago I've made a youtube video explaining what youtube-dl is and how to use it, that got taken down, I've appealed it but they've refused and it's still down
also they haven't actually told me why it was taken down, they've only given me that link about youtube's policies which can all go to hell.
>feeling the need to dl shitty jahrein videos
it's like you asked for it
that was a meme though
Wtf bros...I'm a brainlet and I don't have the time to read through this thread but this is scary. I use youtube-dl so much and I feel superior to my normie friends who use literal spyware websites on the Internet for downloading Youtube videos instead. This won't be taken away from us forever...right?
It already was
You're now as dumb as your friends
question, can youtube-dl be used to download pay/rent movies? I just tried it for shits and giggles and youtube-dl says "ERROR: This video requires payment to watch"
yes, but you need to add -hackmode to the command
Dosent even matter from a legal stand point. A hammer can be used for vandalism and murder but that doesnt mean we ban hammers.
https://law.justia.com/codes/connecticut/2005/title53a/sec53a-106.html
So a hammer is not illegal? Thanks for the pointless link. Why are you still here? You keep getting btfo every time you post some stupid shit. When will you learn? Fucking retarded cunt.
https://law.justia.com/codes/connecticut/2005/title53a/sec53a-106.html
Fuck copyright and fuck intellectual property.
>youtube-dl thread
>before I even read it
>be me
>I have to ask them if youtube-dl is safe from them
>let me what is it about first
>read the post
>tfw
What does it mean? Doesn't work anymore or no more updates?
Latest Windows .exe from last month:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/vn28vo
https://www.sendspace.com/file/vn28vo
https://www.sendspace.com/file/vn28vo
https://www.sendspace.com/file/vn28vo
You can get the windows one from their site.
Where? From whose site?
>>78351547
>>78351626
I have never paid for any form of digital media during the 30 years I've been alive and I never will.
I'm a member of over 30 private trackers and have a ton of free usenet accounts that I've accumulated over the years
I have currently around 200TBs on my main server of content, all pirated.
Now be a good goy and keep buying shit that I will get for free, cuck.
How do I into secret clubs & private servers?
How much will a server cost me per year (maintenance, upgrades)?
private trackers need some initial determination to get into, and maybe some seedboxing to build up a buffer. Also consider donating, for $5-$10 one-time most let go of the inactivity rule for your account. Then it's smooth sailing
Imagine being this much of a consoomer
What the fuck is wrong with these kikes?
The fuck is going to happen if there exists a machine(computer) with readily available material (internet infrastructure) capable of making real life objects?
These should be gassed, they are stumping growth in the name of the all-mighty God called the dollar.
cute pic
Everything digital should be free, it's up to the creator to make a product worth our donations thereafter.
>Everything digital should be free,
says the guy who has never created anything
i think, yeah he has not created. But i think way of donation is good. I think when RMS told you can sell free software they supposed that like a new way for donation. You can buy this software, but you also can build it from sources. The way of payment like a service or stuff like that does not compatible with nature of data and digital. All fucking copyrighters adapt old ideo of payment for physical world for intangible things. It is like geocentric system
agreed
Anon, we are fucking Legion. I think it's very degrading sign to community of free software. Let's DDoS or other damage to fucking copyrighters.
>DDoS Google
You have fun with that.
No bro, now it is RIAA
RIAA isn't an internet business, so...
But we need to create sign of disagreement. We need to appear, and say fuck you.
Why don't they DMCA browsers? They can be used to download copyrighted stuff illegally too after all
Bravo monopolies.
Uou can't just host peer-to-peer video because no one will watch it and if you post on YouTube, you are a slave to them and their ads.
I'd rather be a slave to my viewers desu, but not everyone can cough up a shekel for each """""creator""""" they deem worthy.
rip wintoddlers who now have no place to download their exe from
Literally from their website.
oh i had no idea they had a website
They don't, he's shitposting. (Anyone can make a website, but you need proof that it's legit.)
dumbass
https://youtube-dl.org/
How about you read my post again, retard.
That's their official website linked from their old github page, dumbass.
>linked from their old github page
Sure, sure. And conveniently, that page doesn't exist anymore. Sounds legit.
youtube-dl.org and yt-dl.org redirect to the same webpage
here's an archive of their repository with yt-dl.org in the readme file
https://web.archive.org/web/20200708210230/https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl
Props for the effort. BTW, it's the same exe that's on that sendspace link.
shit's been common knowledge for everyone who even uses the program on the regular.
how are you this ignorant?
Not that guy, but youtube-dl.org always was the shitty front end of them. Keep it calm.
>she doesn't know about scoop
So they are claiming against a tool that basically does the same thing a browser does? It's literally just mimicking what the YouTube player deis and gives you a file instead of playing it in-browser.
Practically speaking nothing illegal is happening, maybe TOS breaking but that's not what's being claimed. This is massive amounts of retard right here.
I don't give a fuck about music, music videos, late night shows, movie trailers, teasers, actor interviews, basically anything produced by "big media" or members of RIAA, being on youtube.
Let them fuck out to Google Play Music:tm: , Google Play Video:tm: , or some other God forgotten Google Play Unwanted Media App:tm: .
And then let normal youtubers post their content undisturbed, and normal users watch it.
Blyat.
Niggers, youtube-dl was abandoned and no longer accepting pull requests. Why are people acting like its the end of the world no one cared about the project 1 week ago.
Youtube-dlc was created and actually merging pull requests but for some reason mirrors of youtube-dl are being rehosted.
So streamlink is going to get taken down too?
Nah.
To further this, they are not retarded. They used Bug Buck Bunny for their test:
https://github.com/streamlink/streamlink/blob/master/tests/plugins/test_youtube.py
they're still retarded for baking in the plugin which clearly states youtube.com into the same repo as the core app. if riaa gets their dmca through then it's a green light to take down everything which can be used to download from youtube.
Not as popular despite being much better
So no
Some of you guys are alright. Don't come to the RIAA headquarters tomorrow.
https://github.com/MrS0m30n3/youtube-dl-gui
Gui werks, though not as versatile and not as tweakable.
>Gui werks, though not as versatile and not as tweakable.
And hasn't been updated for years. Use the fork instead.
https://github.com/axcore/tartube
Thx for the link
>gui babies
Fuck off.
>>gui babies
Bitch when I'm slumped on the sofa at the end of a hard day's work, and I mean ACTUAL work, I just want something I can click, not a command-line application that forces me to go sit at my desk
Fuck off, CLI ain't any better when I just use it to type one command and go to sleep while my shits downloading.
Thumbnails are necessary for some channels. I've considered switching away from CLI just for that.
https://git.osuv.de/star/youtube-dl
Does anyone get this error when you download from the Official URL: youtube-dl.org and select Latest? (http://abf-downloads.openmandriva.org/ytdl)
Works on my machine
looks like my ISP has shitty peering.
Start using a VPN
FUCK AMERIFATS
The real question is why would someone even bother uploading copyrighted material that they dont want distributed later on YouTube? YouTube is a video based social media site where shit is meant to go viral and be spread around. It should be treated similar to nudes, threats, racist posts, drug procurement, etc.. Don't put that shit out there if you don't want people finding out about it and keeping record of it. If you want to use the internet to communicate with a closed group of people or a single person, then use the right tools for small group communication, encrypt your shit, only share what you need to share, and limit the conversation to trusted parties.
I'd like to think all the anti-piracy posts are bait but this site has become such a piece of shit that no doubt many people genuinely respect copyright lmao.
Cute Dia
How retarded do you have to be to put the word YOUTUBE in the name of your program? It's like screaming "dmca me daddy"
>How retarded do you have to be to put the word YOUTUBE in the name of your program? It's like screaming "dmca me daddy"
youtube-dl has been around a long time. The retarded bit was not renaming it, once it became popular and once Jewgle started getting litigious
Jewgle retired Play Music in favour of YouTube Music just yesterday
coincidence?
This shit doesn't make sense at all. They are censoring source codes now? What the fuck?
What's next, qBittorent?
Github needs to be canceled. Maybe we should all move to Bitbucket or something? Or perhaps maybe Gogs since it's self-hosted and thus more difficult to sue?
I can record a YouTube-dl by watching it while turning a screen recorder on
Does that mean the screen recorder is circumventing technological protections?
Is DMCA going to remove all screen recording softwares from Github?
All of those Youtube videos are publicly streamed. How is this lawsuit even a thing? This is crazy
I can record a YouTube video by watching it while turning a screen recorder on
Does that mean the screen recorder is circumventing technological protections?
Is DMCA going to remove all screen recording softwares from Github?
All of those Youtube videos are publicly streamed. How is this lawsuit even a thing? This is crazy
They're desperate and they hold this unrealistic belief that they can make more money when they harass their own customer base. Common misconception.
>the official site got updated with download links and a notice on the DMCA bullshit
I'm hopeful.
>>78354678
alright, so how are they claiming that youtube-dl's purpose is for redistributing material?
claiming that downloading to a convenient format ("convenient" to separate it from the fact that playing youtube "normally" still downloads the content, streaming is just a constrained form of downloading, after all, there's no technical difference from youtube's perspective) is somehow facilitating distribution is absurd
as absurd as claiming a file compression utility facilitates distribution because smaller files are faster to upload