J.K. Rowling’s Fans Smell Blood In The Water Over TERF Remark

J.K. Rowling has been a favorite of leftists for years now. Before Twitter and before woke cancel culture, I remember the children who I played with — and who would eventually become left wingers today in adulthood — would love Harry Potter, and make fairly routine shills to me. I never got into it personally, but I also never begrudged the people who liked that crap.

She has since been a fairly routine darling of the left wing on Twitter. She has made explicit support for bringing refugees into the United Kingdom clear on multiple occasions.

It isn’t the first time she made explicitly left wing claims. She even went after other leftists when they said bad words about women, even conservative ones:

This time, however, she broke from the party line just a teensy little bit. She suggested that maybe firing someone for acknowledging the reality of sex is a bit unhinged. This is of course, a sacreligious act, rendering her a “TERF.”

If you are unfamiliar, a TERF is a “Trans Exclusive Radical Feminist.” In this tweet, she does not exclude transgender people per se. In fact, she says she’s entirely fine with people doing as they please in their personal lives insofar as they aren’t hurting other people. But she also said that sex is real, which is not humoring the derangements of the transgender “community” sufficiently.

J.K. Rowling is Literally Hitler now

The news was all over this. This leaves me in an interesting position, and naturally several others are as well. On the one hand, it’s stupid to try to ruin people merely for disagreeing with you, and I agree with J.K. Rowling; sex is real and she made the exact point I did before the semicolon. However, on the other hand, there is a certain schadenfreude in watching the left self-cannibalize over minor disagreements.

Is it a good thing that J.K. Rowling is being actively destroyed over something so small?

201 thoughts on “J.K. Rowling’s Fans Smell Blood In The Water Over TERF Remark

  1. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Personally, I'm all for rallying behind her because in doing so we ensure that she gets irreparably branded as an alt-right Nazi

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      I doubt she gives a fuck about being called a nazi or whatever. All she cares about is selling her crap and making money.

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        And since her customer-base are all rabid leftists, her being called a Nazi by them destroys her ability to sell her crap and make money. There isn't exactly a lot of overlap between her customer-base and, say, Sam Hyde's customer-base.

        Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous says:

          She's worth over a billion, in betting she's not incredibly worried

          Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            As much as I fucking hate black bastards I have to agree with you.
            If I was a billionaire I wouldn't care what others think.

          2. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            What's being a billionaire if you get ostracized and publicly harassed?

          3. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            What's being ostracized and publicly harrased if you're a billionaire?

          4. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Having to pay for friends or any company at all. Seems pretty hollow

          5. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            >needing company at all
            Reddit is down the hall.

          6. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Rich people are far from being free spirit detached from the human world.
            Often, they are really embodied into the society and need the populace approval to feel their empty materialist life.

          7. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Thats not how human psychology works.

            Even the richest people in the world like Bill Gates care about continuing their successful careers.

    2. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      ALL HAIL THE NEW QUEEN OF /POL/

      J.
      K.
      R
      O
      W
      L
      I
      N
      G

      >cheers and applause

      Reply
    3. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      Oh boohoo – a billionaire is getting called mean names on twitter by a small group of people that get pissed off by anything! Whatever shall we do?
      Seriously, when you have that much money, why the fuck would you care what anyone says online? They'll get distracted by the next outrage next week.

      Why is FPBP always so true?

      Reply
  2. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    We need to co-opt Harry Potter and begin using it for political analogies like the trannies have for the last decade.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      HP is for the most part conservative and almost reactionary, which is part of why it's so enjoyable. Rowling is a fucking hypocrite.

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        HP is 200% liberal propaganda.

        >Voldemort, gifted kid forced to join institution for no other reason that you must relinquish your agency to institution
        >implies that skillful and gifted individuals are a direct threat to the monopoly of institution
        >Ministry of magic is liberal surveillance apparatus wet dream
        >Every sorcerer is spied on 24/7, only institution-sanctionned use of magic is tolerated, else wizards teleport to arrest you the second you misuse magic
        >prison sucks your soul away
        >institutions, institutions, institutions
        Foucault would've had a field day with HP

        Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous says:

          Definitely see your point. Wouldn't go as far as 'propaganda' though.

          Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Not propaganda in the sense that JK Rowling consciously wrote it as such but in the fact that its spread was hegemonic. Propaganda is best understood through the definition given by Ellul (much like the concept of revolution)

    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      In this case she isn't, certain people are making it into an extremely black and white issue. The whole debacle involves two men that occasionally dress as women and do not identify as women throwing a shitstorm. One is even a former politician that pissed off an equality for women group by calling them "roasters" and implying they were having an hysterical women tantrum, and was generally disliked as a politician for being a shit flinging drama troll. The other one is a rich banker and took an award aimed at women with no protests.

      It's two Eric Cartman's throwing a fit about not having their own private bathroom, more or less.

      Reply
  3. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    >sex is real
    Sex is real but even sexual characteristics aren't binary. Gender on the other hand, is a social construct. So you can be a male (sex) and a women (gender).

    >firing people for disagreeing with you is retarded
    I'm not sure of the specifics of the case. But firing someone for discrimination or harassment isn't "firing people for disagreeing with you".

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      So femoids who aren't feminine but are female are not women? Sounds pretty based.

      Reply
  4. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    >Sex is real but even sexual characteristics aren't binary. Gender on the other hand, is a social construct. So you can be a male (sex) and a women (gender).

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      I never said being a women was about being feminine. At the end of the day the only criteria for being a women is identifying has such

      404 argument not found

      Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous says:

          Certainly. But if society recognizes trans women as women, then they are in fact women. And not doing so is denying them as humans and therefore immoral.

          Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            >then they are in fact women.
            Not until they have two X chromosomes.

          2. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            I don't think you're entitled to anything just because you're human. I also find morality to be a spook.

          3. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            >if society recognizes trans women as women, then they are in fact women

            Big if. And before you say it, "leftists" are not "society." As it turns out, we're in a big debate as a society if identifying as a woman makes you one. If gender is tied to sex (which, to normal people, it is and will continue to be), then identifying as a woman doesn't make you one.

          4. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Nope. There are plenty of intersex people who don't have two X chromosomes and are still women.

            If you mean entitled in like a cosmic sense then no. But being born in a particular country, you are entitled to basic rights and legal protections and what have you. One of those is to not be harassed because you identify as a different gender than the one you were assigned at birth.

            >If gender is tied to sex
            In what way is gender tied to sex exactly? The concepts of "women" or "man", "feminine" or "masculine", the proper way each gender should look or act, all of it has changed dramatically from culture to culture, yet penises and vaginas have remained the same.

          5. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            >intersex
            The exception to the rule.

          6. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            So?
            If you say every duck is white, therefore if you're not white you can't be a duck, then I find you a black duck, you're forced to admit being white is not essential to being a duck, the same way having two X chromosomes is not essential to being a woman.

          7. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Definitions are exclusionary by necessity, sure. They're just useful abstractions. Defining trannies as women is non-useful. It helps to think about this in percentages rather than definitions. Intersex people deviate from the average 'woman', but in a statistically insignificant way. Not true for trannies.

          8. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            If you're going out of your way to interact with someone, after they made it clear they do not wish to interact with you, in a way that causes the other party physical harm or emotional distress.

          9. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            But the thing is, I wish to not interact with trannies, ever. Say I created a space that allows no trannies. Is that harassment?

          10. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            >for what you want
            ???

            Let's just take a specific example. A person indicates themselves as transgender to me in a social context. I immediately leave the interaction without saying a word. Is that harassment?

          11. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Depends on the social context. If you hold some kind of institutional authority e.g. you're a government employee somewhere and that leaving of the interaction deprives them of some services or similar they have a right to (you effectively stop them giving a police statement or getting passport or something) then yes that is immoral and that would constitute abuse. That's quite a clear cut instance as well, like you have a moral duty towards your fellow man in many situations and while it doesn't always meet the threshold of abuse, refusing to interact with someone in that way can be immoral.

            If you mean can you exclude certain classes of people from certain areas or ineractions e.g. as a business owner, depends on the country and the situation. Ru Paul as another example is allowed to exclude transexuals i.e. people who have had surgical work done, from his drag race in the same way he can prevent non transvestites from participating.

          12. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            None of that is what I meant. If I start a literature club for example, with a 'no trannies' policy, is that harassment?

          13. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Probably depends where you live, but not necessarily. Harassment to my mind isn't the right word either unless you're actively seeking out trannies to exclude. Try it and see what happens, then you'll know.

          14. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            So wait, do you have a definition of harassment or not? Because you both provide your own, but then defer to the legal definition. Which one is it?

          15. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            I've tried to interpret the comments in the best possible/most meaningful way, which is why I switched harassment to abuse and immoral in the initial response. Harassment is an unwanted communication or interaction that has some kind of repetitive or normalised nature to it, that roughly covers all harassment law I'm familiar with. In some places it can be a single unwanted communication or interaction, usually that's if there's a complex interaction (it happened in one meeting but over several smaller interactions) or if there's some kind of regular discrimination in the wider society that's related to it though.

            So depending on where you live, posting an ad on a communal board that says "no trannies" could constitute harassment. Inviting like minded people on a one to one basis wouldn't, nothing stops you forming pretty much any group in that way though. I would think going to a trans event and shouting "YOU CANNOT JOIN MY LITERATURE GROUP NO TRANNIES ALLOWED THERE" would meet the threshold for harassment everywhere in the West. The issue is not in forming the group/space, but in how you communicate it.

          16. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Well, you just moved between normative and legal for no reason. My question was never about the legalities, and I provided two examples to help explicate that. Are those examples harassment in a moral sense, according to you?

          17. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            >There are plenty of intersex people
            name 100

      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        >Identyfing as a woman makes you a woman.
        This is why I am a gender nihlist. Saying x is a woman is a meaningless and vaccous statement.

        Reply
  5. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    >let's rally behind a feminist catlady to own the libs

    Reply
  6. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Let them fight. Gatekeep the things you like from former Potterhead refugees.

    Reply
  7. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Nothing is more fun than watching leftists eat themselves

    Reply
  8. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    gotta love the mental acrobatics conservahicks go through. man-hating feminists are BASED, as long as they make fun of trannies, apparently
    what even is politics anymore

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      ok contrapoints but you call man-hating feminists 'based' when they love transgenders, so you aren't fooling anyone

      Reply
  9. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    she deserves it she went woke all those years its time she pays the toll

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      She is mentally ill; note her sanpaku eyes. She has a great misfortune in her future.

      Reply
  10. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Duh. We put up a token defense so the dogs get more rabid. Then watch them tear her apart.

    Reply
  11. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Fuck you, OP. J.K. Rowling is an amazing storyteller and proud woman who pulled her life out of misery and brought joy into children's hearts everywhere. What have you racist bigots achieved in your lives other than post counts?

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      Rowling is a shit writer. Who genuinely cares about some made up shit about manlets with big feet and a gold ring?

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        >Who genuinely cares about some made up shit about manlets with big feet and a gold ring?
        exactly, or some pedo school fairy-tale written by some hack linguist

        Reply
      2. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        But anon, the gold ring of power was amn allegory of the paedo ring of power, which is why cute, little boys were ensnared in it and had to destroy it. When destroyed, Satan himself is destroyed. It's not made up, at all.

        Reply
  12. Avatar
    Sneed says:

    If only that lady Maya had just stuck to the plan. Shed falsify tax information, but she knows that its for the cause of inclusion!

    Reply
  13. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Harry Potter and the Protocols of the Elders of Gringotts.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      I foung threads where some unironically claimed this is an example of Rowling being problematic. Just like non-British characters names and the Irish having stuff blow up around him a lot.

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        She had a race of slaves who liked slavery, and mocked the one person who was concerned with the situation. And every other magical race is either on the verge of extinction or actively oppressed.

        And despite the bad guys being a bunch of racist terrorists, the good guys literally do nothing to fix the society after killing Voldemort. They literally don't have a ideology or anything, bar not really liking racism (and really mainly the stuff aimed at them).

        Reply
      2. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        JK, specially around the time she was writing HP, was subtle racist, which wasnt uncommon around the time
        >Chinese named Cho Chang
        >Black guy without father
        >The weasleys are dumb and poor irish who only know how to fuck
        >Goblins are jewish bankers

        Shen then took a SJW feminist facade to stay relevant, but the facade would only last so long before she fucked up

        Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous says:

          >SJW feminist

          She's a Blairite centrist, who probably voted Lib Dems, the centrist party. She spent 2017-2019 just shitting on Corbyn on Twitter in between potter more nonsense.

          Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Nah she went full feminist after the election. Trump literally drove her insane. She also supported Hermonie being played by a black woman.

          2. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            One of her books had a theme of the media becoming dangerous lying government shills if it's convenient for them.
            A few years later she believes every word from the leftist mainstream media even if it's about youtube celebrities.

          3. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            It’s funny, a lot of inspiration for the internal struggle within wizard society and the government came from fascist Spain. But she fell for the trap many an author or person who uses historical struggles to justify their words or action has: both sides were pretty terrible.

      3. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        Rowling is a British woman, she probably does hate the irish.

        Reply
  14. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    >Should we defend her or just sit back and watch the dogs rip her up?
    no yes

    Reply
  15. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Naturally she's one of us. The entire series of books was about the perils of moving forward with 'the plan' without enough preparedness. Even warning about the lefts 'messiah' complex with the chosen child.
    We should of course all call each other death eaters now and use the term mudblood constantly.

    Reply
  16. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    When Robespierre goes to the guillotine it's an occasion for hilarity and merriment.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incroyables_and_Merveilleuses

    >>Ornate carriages reappeared on the streets of Paris the day after the execution (28 July 1794) of Maximilien Robespierre, which brought an end to the Jacobin-era Committee of Public Safety and signaled the commencement of the Thermidorian Reaction. There were masters and servants once more in Paris, and the city erupted in a furor of pleasure-seeking and entertainment. Theaters thrived, and popular music satirized the excesses of the Revolution. One popular song of the period called on the French people to "share my horror" and to send "these drinkers of human blood" back amongst the monsters from which they had sprung. Its lyrics rejoiced that "your tormentors finally grow pale at the tardy dawn of vengeance".[1]

    >>Many public balls were bals des victimes at which young aristocrats who had lost loved ones to the guillotine danced in mourning dress or wore black armbands, greeting one another with violent movements of the head as if in decapitation.[n 2] A ball held at the Hôtel Thellusson on the rue de Provence in the 9th arrondissement of Paris restricted its guest list to the grown children of the guillotined.[2]

    And the men all carried big twisted clubs to thrash the sans culottes from the streets.

    That is what we must become. Les Incroyables

    Reply
  17. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    I think we should partially defend her. Not too much, or else we will get called a joke (since she is a sjw) but not too little, so we show her how better right wing is.

    Reply
  18. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    >watch them cannabalise each other and say nothing
    remember to kek

    Reply
  19. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Watch and enjoy. Within a week she'll be apologizing for her bigotry and the hyenas will still be consuming her. Intervene or not, the outcome is still the same: Rowling remains an insufferable virtue signalling cunt.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      This. Never step in on domestic violence, this bitch is still gonna roll over for Twitter in the end.

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        Yeah but calling her /ourgirl/ might actually make her apology never get accepted. Ever.

        Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous says:

          She would hate it if /pol/ grouped together to kiss her feet and call her mummy in a public forum

          Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            I agree, but that won't stop the effect it has. It'd be like pouring gasoline onto a fire.

  20. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Yep it's a great thing because it's another point to bring up to show Leftists how mentally fucked they are.

    Reply
  21. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    /r/GenderCritical and their ilk are still man-hating cunts even if they're completely right about the trans movement. So in my opinion, don't get involved, just laugh at them from a safe distance.

    I still remember at my old workplace, this 40 year old man came out as trans. Despite most of the female staff complaining that they feel uncomfortable with getting changed in the same room as him, it still didn't make a difference.

    It was fucking hilarious.

    Reply
  22. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    She didn't really deviate though. For some bizarre reason there is a large, powerful and active TERF movement in the UK.

    It is really bizarre because if she lived in the US or Canada she would never in a million years take this positions because she would be totally socially isolated.

    Reply
  23. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Why would I defend a woman who cant stop talking shit from her mansion as she bathes in billions? The fuck is twitter going to do to her? She doesnt have to do anything. She could never apologize and nothing would happen. Nobody who likes her shit books would burn them in disgust except a small handful of losers who would go back to it anyway.

    Reply
  24. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    The latter
    She helped create these monsters in the first place

    Reply
  25. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Even if she said fuck niggers i would let them eat her

    Reply
  26. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    First they came for the conservatives and I said nothing.
    Then they came for those that believed in biology and I said nothing
    Then they came for those that believed math was not racist and I said nothing.
    Then they came for me and there was noone left to tell.

    Reply
  27. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Let her be devoured by the pitbulls she raised. It's the faith of all leftists to be sacrifed on the altar of ideological purity why those even more extreme on the left.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      That's the final lesson. That today's progressives are tommorow's conservatives.

      Reply
  28. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    The right wing people should defend J.K. Rowling.
    It will even more piss off the lefties.

    Reply
  29. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    >Should we defend her or just sit back and watch the dogs rip her up?
    I wouldn't bother white-knighting. Its a waste of time. Just make some popcorn and laugh. Life would be a lot better if people had to deal with the consequences of their own bad choices on their own.

    Reply
  30. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Rowling is secretly redpilled on nonwhites.
    >Europe contains half of all magical schools
    >Mahoutokoro is canonically the smallest school, despite its domain including 1/3 of the global population
    >Americas have colonial schools, proving Amerindians knew fuck all about magic

    Reply
  31. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Let the tolerant left eat her. Maybe her next novel will be more sympathetic towards the "nazis."

    Reply
  32. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Forget about passing the popcorn. I'll take the entire cart with all the fixings.
    There's nothing that brightens my day than watching alt-leftists turn on each other. Schadenfreude at its finest form.

    Reply
  33. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    did she learn nothing from dawkins? 'progress' doesn't stop cause you say so sweetie

    Reply
  34. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    This is the non binary tranny the women she was defending attacked.

    Pol should side with this "man" for the lolz . Its the only logical choice.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      If I recall:
      >British female scientist says on their personal twitter that a trans person is still the biological sex they were born as.
      >Scientist gets fired.
      >JK defends the scientist because one should not lose their job over their opinion. (Bonus is that she is defending a woman.)
      >Twitter and reddit lose their minds, calling her a TERF and a bigot.

      Reply
  35. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    If you have a vagina and two x chromosomes you are a woman.
    If you have a penis and a x and a y chromosome you are a man.
    If you are outside this paradigm by accident of birth then you are a freak of nature and you have my pity.
    If you lie outside this paradigm by choice you are a depraved tranny and you'll get what's coming to you.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      That's not gender though. What makes someone a baseball player or musician? It's not something physical and its the same as how gender identity works

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        Can you please go into more detail on how it's 'the same'?

        Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            So it's enough for things to belong to share a single category to be the same? Do you consider all triangles to be the same then?

          2. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            No they aren't, the law of identity is computation which is not socially constructed

          3. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Since these people also believe race is a social construct should there not be transracial people

          4. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            See, this is why I hate the fact that Right-Wingers reject Postmodernism wholesale. Postmodernism by itself not normative, it's just been utilized by trannies and other things for their purposes. We could do the exact same thing to them. Instead we have this throwing-out-the-baby-with-the-bathwater bullshit.

          5. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Because undermining your principles to own the libs is usually a poor strategy in the long term.

          6. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            That is incorrect. In the long run, the ones with the fewest principles always win.

          7. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            No cost is too high if you ask me. Besides, I'm not saying you should stop having principles. Just having fewer than the enemy will suffice.

          8. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            The more you abandon your principles in search of victory the harder a time you will have of instigating them when you win. Once you fully unleash the postmodernist worldview then there will be no putting it back in the box.

          9. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            I really don't think we have a choice at this point. We either win and hope for the best or lose. Only the first path has any probability of a positive outcome.

          10. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            please read a history book that covers history prior to roughly 1500AD

      2. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        Wearing a dress and chopping off your dick doesn't make you a woman just a dude on a LARP.

        Reply
    2. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      In what way isn't it? You have no direct knowledge of most of the things mentioned in in most of the people you interact with on a daily basis.

      Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous says:

          So you have a worse thought out, but in form more or less the same, argument as Rowling i.e. that sex is like a hidden variable, it is out there, but gender is performative, something that you can play with and is open to interpretation.

          Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            >that sex is like a hidden variable
            there is nothing about sex that is hidden

    3. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      You live in a nudist colony? If you follow then you live in a nudist colony where you regularly perform multi-tissue sampled karyotyping on each other?

      Reply
  36. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Btw this is the "transwoman" who started this whole mess. Yes "she" looks like this.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      I really, really hope this guy is just fucking with everyone to prove a point

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        >this guy
        "excuse me anon, but it has come to our attention that you have been making transphobic comments online. i'm afraid you're fired."

        Reply
    2. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      Correction, it's not a transwoman, it's a "non-binary" trans person.

      Reply
  37. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    I still hate her for smearing Pewdiepie. Live by callout culture, die by callout culture.

    Reply
  38. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    These people are potential allies.

    Look what happened to Germaine Greer. Same thing. Massive feminist and then the trans lobby went after her.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      Are you not a tranny though if you wouldn't consider fucking a less masculine male? I would say that is quite feminine and asking for a good dicking.

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        That would not make you a tranny no. IG would make you a flaming faggot however.

        Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous says:

          But you are a man with non-masculine traits (low sex drive), while I am fulfilling a paradigm of manliness that dates to antiquity and further. There is little more manly than completely dominating a little femboy.

          Reply
          1. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Manliness is a spook and you are a faggot.

          2. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            It can be a spook. Simply being more manly than you can still be described as manliness, so long as one doesn't pursue manliness for its own sake (or not).

          3. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            Everything is a spook. We gain knowledge largely by improving the accuracy and utility of said spooks.

          4. Avatar
            Anonymous says:

            believing in spooks is a spook
            that's not clever wordplay i absolutely believe this

    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      >no one cares
      >this board is 90 percent white trash conservahicks whining about trans folk
      Lmao. Okay.

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        >unstable schizophrenics make asses out of themselves both online and irl
        >point this out
        >lol rent free

        Reply
      2. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        >unstable schizophrenics make asses out of themselves both online and irl
        >point this out
        >lol rent free

        Reply
  39. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    I feel sorry for trannies sometimes, knowing that even the other letters of the alphabet soup hate them.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      Everyone on the left loves them besides TERFs and tankies

      Reply
      1. Avatar
        Anonymous says:

        You sound like a faggot nb.

        Nah, the left-wing doesn't really care about trannies at all they just find them a useful tool, same as niggers and muslims.

        Reply
  40. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Why do so many people on /lit/ take the "gender isn't a social construst" approach when arguing with trannies even though it's a dead end and not supported by science nor history?
    The most efficient way to argue against them is to prove that traditional gender norms are the better choice despite them being arbitrary in essence, which can easily be done by referring them to tranny suicide rates, happiness and overall quality of mental health of people raised by a heterosexual couple in a good family ..etc
    Nothing makes the trannies seethe more than someone using their own social construct argument against them.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      /pol/tards are so easily to manipulate
      the antithesis of "gender is a social construct" is "gender is a biological construct" which just means everyone with a dick is a man and etc, which perfectly satisfies the leftist tendency to destroy words and their meanings down to the material base level and strip them of all significance. people who say "i have a penis, ergo i'm a man and no further becoming is necessary on my part in order to be a man" are basically arguing the other half of the "gender is a social construct, ergo it doesn't exist and has no significance" sexual materialism ideology

      Reply
  41. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Defend her obviously, she's made mistakes as we all have and deserves our support against a mutual enemy. Also salt mine.

    Reply
  42. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    are you retarded, we should attack her and anyone terfy even a little bit. seriously many of those crazy trannies are probably 4chan trolls

    Reply
  43. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    All that matters is her statement is logically correct. Fuck the leftists narrative

    Reply
  44. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    All that matters is her statement is logically correct. Fuck the leftists narrative
    The science is settled,seriously.

    Reply
  45. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    She needs to be made into a right wing symbol until she snaps, becomes a man and then kills xerself.
    This cunt is nothing but a money laundering puppet for the elite.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      >She needs to be made into a right wing symbol until she snaps
      Honestly, it would make the lefties snap way harder. They may demonize her now, but Harry Potter is an enormous part of their pop culture-defined identity. If we turned her into the next Ben Garrison, the salt would be unprecedented.

      Reply
  46. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    >saying you can't change sex makes you a terf
    >no mention of gender whatsoever
    absolutely batshit fucking crazy

    Reply
  47. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    mentally ill shut in males always go tranny for the attention, and these are the people the blue hairs in the media are wanting everyone to bow to? fuck off with that faggot crap

    Reply
  48. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Rally.
    Rowling is a covert one-nation Tory posing as a liberal. If you understand Harry Potter is a one-nation Tory manifesto that was accidentally coopted by liberals, you'd know this turn of events makes perfect sense.
    She is part of the necessary plan to return Britain into an unfucked state without shitskins and mudslime and she needs our support.

    Reply
  49. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    I plan on just kicking back & enjoying the hell out of this one.
    The Harry Potter shit has been so widely used as some allegory for anti-Trumpism this shit is sure to be of rare hilarity.

    Reply
    1. Avatar
      Anonymous says:

      Because the books are too fucking smart for 90% of the SJWs that use them as anti trump or anti racist shit. And the books arent even that smart, they're half Roald Dahl regurgitation and half aristocracy wank.
      Potter is pro nobles and their peasants, anti middle class Dursleys, anti rich entrepreneurs Malfoy, anti government Umbridge and anti autocracy Voldemort. It's an extremely specific political alignment that almost noone shares so the kids just appended liberalism.

      Reply
  50. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Why would I ever in good conscience rally behind the woman responsible for the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

    Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

    >a-at least the books were good though
    "No!"
    The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

    I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

    Reply
  51. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    We should publicly display our support for /ourgal/ J.K. Rowling. She has taken a stand and shown her support for the cause of transphobia and has publicly endorsed the online harassment of trannies. It is time for us to do our bit, lads, and show her we support her too.

    Reply
  52. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    support her…that's how you convert people to your cause…when the agree with you…support that strongly….then when you disagree with her…she will be more likely to listen.

    Reply
  53. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    Can we get the hashtag "#4ChanstandswithRowling" going lads?

    Reply
  54. Avatar
    Anonymous says:

    I say we attack her as well. I'm offended by the fact that if they refer to her as a nazi, it really cheapens it for the rest of us.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll Up